• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Blonde moment

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Blonde moment"

Collapse

  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    I requested an overnight bank transfer the other week, and wrote the amount on the FAX as "twelve hundred".

    An hour later I had a phone call from someone at the bank, and it turned out he and his colleagues were all totally mystified by this.

    They suspected it might be the same as "one thousand two hundred", but just wanted to check!
    I have run into this sort of thing. I use "hundred" for anything up to 1900 but would say "three thousand four hundred" instead of "thirty four hundred".



    I have found that many Brits don't understand "triple three" in a part number, insisting on "three double three" (or do I mean "double three, three"?).
    Last edited by Sysman; 28 June 2014, 13:52.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    I requested an overnight bank transfer the other week, and wrote the amount on the FAX as "twelve hundred".

    An hour later I had a phone call from someone at the bank, and it turned out he and his colleagues were all totally mystified by this.

    They suspected it might be the same as "one thousand two hundred", but just wanted to check!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    I use milestones.
    It's ages since I've seen milestones mentioned.

    Apart from a project management course 4 years ago it takes me back to the early 80s.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    I use milestones.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    I had a similar thing with a client telling me my timesheet didn't add up. I pointed out that the agency, for reasons that remain unclear, specifically required that the individual days on the timesheet were given in hours and minutes (e.g. 7:30), while the total figure shown at the foot of the column had to be in decimal (e.g. 37.25)
    I've used timesheet systems like that.

    Some timesheet systems are so awful to use that this niggle pales into insignificance.

    We can blame lawyers for timesheets

    Last edited by Sysman; 28 June 2014, 10:40.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Mars electronics in Reading has a clock that reads 100 decimal minutes to each hour. So 4:30 is not half past four. It is used for clocking in and out and keeping track of flexitime.

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    It's about time they decimalised time really.
    Andersen Consulting (before they became Accenture) used to have timesheets down to tenths of an hour.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    It's about time they decimalised time really.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    I had a similar thing with a client telling me my timesheet didn't add up. I pointed out that the agency, for reasons that remain unclear, specifically required that the individual days on the timesheet were given in hours and minutes (e.g. 7:30), while the total figure shown at the foot of the column had to be in decimal (e.g. 37.25)

    Leave a comment:


  • CloudWalker
    started a topic Blonde moment

    Blonde moment

    You do have to wonder when an agency questions your time sheet hours.
    I put an invoice in for 166.5 hours work as I bill monthly. The accounts girl thought I was trying to put through 166:50 hours. She said it doesn't add up to the same amount on your invoice, and that I need to correct my mistake.
    It was only when I pointed out that 0:30 minuets is 0.5 of an hour unit, then the penny dropped

Working...
X