• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "How many times will Charles mention this over the next few weeks?"

Collapse

  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    If your king is hob-nobbing with your traditional world-war rivals, it's bound to stir it up.
    It's better than your King being closely related to your world-war rivals I suppose.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    The abdication of the king was the reason for the Second World War? I think I need to relearn some history. Clearly I've been misled.
    If your king is hob-nobbing with your traditional world-war rivals, it's bound to stir it up. He probably told them on the QT that he didn't like Poles or Czechs, and one thing led to another.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Doesn't it defeat the point of a monarch if they abdicate?
    Not if that country's monarchy has a precedent.

    If they choose their successor it starts to get wobbly though.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Madge is hanging on until she dies. The point is, as she has said several times, she took a vow to do exactly that at her Coronation and she is damned sure she is going to honour it. if she can't continue, then Charlie will turn Regent and take over her duties, but he won't be king until she is no more.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Well, we did start a world war just afterwards. But not much other than that I suppose.
    The abdication of the king was the reason for the Second World War? I think I need to relearn some history. Clearly I've been misled.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    In what way? Can't imagine it affected the lives of the ordinary people in the slightest.
    Well, we did start a world war just afterwards. But not much other than that I suppose.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Doesn't it defeat the point of a monarch if they abdicate?
    There's a point to a monarch?

    But yes. Surely the monarch is something you just are, not something you can choose to be. I can't phone up my younger brother and say "I've decided not to be the eldest any more. It's your turn".

    It was hard for the UK to recover after Edward VIII
    In what way? Can't imagine it affected the lives of the ordinary people in the slightest.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Well I suppose Charlie could take over the reins (or reigns?!) as Prince Regent if the Queen ever simply becomes to frail to continue the job.

    But if the late Queen Mother was anything to go by, that may not be for years yet. Walking up and down those long palace corridors seems to keep the Royals hale and hearty to an amazing old age.
    When I think of the Prince Regent, I always think of this

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Doesn't it defeat the point of a monarch if they abdicate? ...
    Well I suppose Charlie could take over the reins (or reigns?!) as Prince Regent if the Queen ever simply becomes too frail to continue the job.

    But if the late Queen Mother was anything to go by, that may not be for years yet. Walking up and down those long palace corridors seems to keep the Royals hale and hearty to an amazing old age.
    Last edited by OwlHoot; 2 June 2014, 16:30.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Doesn't it defeat the point of a monarch if they abdicate?

    It was hard for the UK to recover after Edward VIII

    If she did a Beatrice of the Netherlands and passed onto Charles would may it hard to see any point in perpetuating the monarchy

    Leave a comment:


  • How many times will Charles mention this over the next few weeks?

    Just a little conversation over dinner, mummy.

    BBC News - King Juan Carlos of Spain abdicating

Working...
X