• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Students

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Students"

Collapse

  • RetSet
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Students need a goal. At the moment housing is way too expensive. Why should the young bother working?

    make mortgage costs non tax deductible on BTL. And tax rental income.
    And if property is financed by means other than BTL e.g. commercial loans? And rental income is already taxed.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Students need a goal. At the moment housing is way too expensive. Why should the young bother working?

    make mortgage costs non tax deductible on BTL. And tax rental income.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    In some useful courses, eg medicine, there is serious shortage of places and even those with good A levels cannot get a place.

    Rather agree with eek and Sue Ellen that a bit more government supply and control of such things might not be a bad idea. Not a socialist but think that sometimes just leaving everything to the free market in the hope that a pursuit of profit will deliver the right ends is naive.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    The other one was 6 months uni 6 months work.
    I did one of those. 6 months in a drug company and 6 at a tyre factory. Probably quite useful experience, I learnt not to annoy people by singing all the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    What loans?

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    They used to have degree courses called sandwich degrees, which were similar to what you describe. Maybe these days there is less assurance that the students could find a job for the "sandwich year".
    Completely different, but okay.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Isn't that the circular argument to parents not asking why on earth are you doing that degree. What on earth will you do with it...
    It depends on the parents.

    Ask anyone from certain immigrant backgrounds over 35 what would have happened if they said they were going to do a Drama degree.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    They used to have degree courses called sandwich degrees, which were similar to what you describe. Maybe these days there is less assurance that the students could find a job for the "sandwich year".
    Yep - all students with their heads screwed on try and do sandwich degrees now.

    I know people who couldn't get promoted without a degree so some of them did Masters degrees to get around it.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    It doesn't need to necessarily be part time education. I'm certain I learned more in my first year of work than I did in the preceeding three years of university, so why couldn't my first 3 years of work (i.e. from 18) have counted as a degree? ...
    They used to have degree courses called sandwich degrees, which were similar to what you describe. Maybe these days there is less assurance that the students could find a job for the "sandwich year".

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    That's a plus point to doing it in the workplace. The fact there is a workplace means that there must be some real world relevance, and some demand. If somebody gets a job writing Klingon poetry, and can demonstrate that after three years their expertise is what would be expected of degree level, then they get a degree. The university or government doesn't need to decide to support klingon poetry.
    Isn't that the circular argument to parents not asking why on earth are you doing that degree. What on earth will you do with it...

    Its probably worth explaining how the real world works for people.

    Good GCSEs allow you to do A levels and help you get into a better university
    Good A levels let you get into University (they also check your GCSE results)
    Good degree gets you on a good graduate scheme (now you GCSE results are worthless).

    Your next job is dependent on your previous job and your degree

    From then on its totally dependent on your last 2 jobs.....

    Once most people hit 30 they rarely move jobs unless forced to.... As such most parents are totally and utterly unable to explain in simple words how the world works...

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    How do the universities/government decide what degrees and qualifications are directly relevant and what aren't?
    That's a plus point to doing it in the workplace. The fact there is a workplace means that there must be some real world relevance, and some demand. If somebody gets a job writing Klingon poetry, and can demonstrate that after three years their expertise is what would be expected of degree level, then they get a degree. The university or government doesn't need to decide to support klingon poetry.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    It doesn't need to necessarily be part time education. I'm certain I learned more in my first year of work than I did in the preceeding three years of university, so why couldn't my first 3 years of work (i.e. from 18) have counted as a degree? Obviously you'd need some kind of assessment from a university, like exams, and a certain amount of co-operation with employers to make sure the work you were doing was of the required level, but if you're learning in your job, as you always do with something technical, and it's sophisticated enough, why bother ever going to a classroom?
    That is called an apprenticeship and if you pick a good one you will walk out with both a degree, some cash (or at least less debt) and worthwhile work experience. If anyone has an 18 year old in West Yorkshire interested in IT, the one the current clientco does would be far better than any degree....

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    It doesn't need to necessarily be part time education. I'm certain I learned more in my first year of work than I did in the preceeding three years of university, so why couldn't my first 3 years of work (i.e. from 18) have counted as a degree? Obviously you'd need some kind of assessment from a university, like exams, and a certain amount of co-operation with employers to make sure the work you were doing was of the required level, but if you're learning in your job, as you always do with something technical, and it's sophisticated enough, why bother ever going to a classroom?
    Some people do degrees directly relevant to their work.

    My postgraduate studies where (and are) and I studied with undergraduates whose degrees were as the industries they were in directly help evolve the degree timetable.

    How do the universities/government decide what degrees and qualifications are directly relevant and what aren't?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    FTFY. Looking at Newcastle University Social Sciences courses don't require labs or expensive training so are far more profitable to run.
    Cheaper to get home and EU students in but not lucrative enough for getting the money spinning foreign students in.

    There are some science and engineering courses that are about 50% foreign non-EU students particularly at the postgraduate level.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    There are ways to educate and train most people without them being in full time education until their early 20s and so part time education might be part of the solution....
    It doesn't need to necessarily be part time education. I'm certain I learned more in my first year of work than I did in the preceeding three years of university, so why couldn't my first 3 years of work (i.e. from 18) have counted as a degree? Obviously you'd need some kind of assessment from a university, like exams, and a certain amount of co-operation with employers to make sure the work you were doing was of the required level, but if you're learning in your job, as you always do with something technical, and it's sophisticated enough, why bother ever going to a classroom?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X