- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Mathematical formula required
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Mathematical formula required"
Collapse
-
You've made an error in your logic. I've fixed it but it doesn't help me with my problem.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostWell you have to put the result first and then all aspects of the formula and then remove factors until you come up with the solution...
So taking the facts..
sasguru = arse + elbow
Now an arse tends to have a hole and the question is about definition it is important we add this factor so would be come
sasguru = (arse*hole) + elbow
Another observation to take in to account is the fact he has two elbows so we add this in..
sasguru = (arse*hole) + elbow + elbow
Going through the calculation to reduce to it's simplest form gives
sasguru = arsehole + 2 elbows
That help at all?Last edited by sasguru; 31 March 2014, 16:21.
Leave a comment:
-
Well you have to put the result first and then all aspects of the formula and then remove factors until you come up with the solution...
So taking the facts..
sasguru = arse - eblow
Now an arse tends to have a hole and the question is about definition it is important we add this factor so would be come
sasguru = (arse*hole) - elbow
Another observation to take in to account is the fact he has two elbows so we add this in..
sasguru = (arse*hole) - elbow + elbow
Going through the calculation to reduce to it's simplest form gives
sasguru = arsehole
That help at all?
Leave a comment:
-
Feck me, I haven't a clue.Originally posted by sasguru View PostCan someone tell me the formula for how to tell my arse apart from my elbow?
Leave a comment:
-
Not his elbow, no, but possibly my left elbow, which clicks when I bend it.Originally posted by Troll View PostIf you find sound emanating from it then it probably isn't your elbow
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
If you find sound emanating from it then it probably isn't your elbow
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
It was the number I wanted. Can never remember what the higher rate is after the tax credit has been applied.Originally posted by d000hg View PostDid he ask for a formula, or ask for the number to use? The latter is a case of lacking knowledge which is more forgiveable.
Bit of a misleading thread title
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36


Leave a comment: