• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: NATO SC

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "NATO SC"

Collapse

  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    Nothing wrong with the authorities' judgement. Sadly, it's yours they will be assessing...
    From where I sit, you just failed.
    Failure I leave for others. I'm in the business of succeeding / freelancing.

    I'm reminded of my youth on the CB Radio. I used to hook up the amplifier to boost the output to 200W, tape the mic down and play a song when I saw the government van doing the patrols for illegal broadcasting without a licence.

    Fun times.
    Last edited by scooterscot; 3 March 2014, 18:02.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Take my obligations seriously because I have a linkined profile? Because I participate on a online forum? Little England at it's finest.

    If the authority cannot determine or use reason and good judgement about the suitability of a candidate they probably should look for a new job themselves.
    Nothing wrong with the authorities' judgement. Sadly, it's yours they will be assessing...
    From where I sit, you just failed.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by DirtyDog View Post
    I don't think reading any of scooter's posts could be thought of as yielding intelligence.
    Exactly. And you remember that. Foook I don't remember switching on my webcam....

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyDog
    replied
    Originally posted by Ticktock View Post
    As it states, the simple fact that people with certain skill sets hold or are applying for SC can yield intelligence.
    I don't think reading any of scooter's posts could be thought of as yielding intelligence.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by Ticktock View Post
    Well done. Now try reading the article and then reply.
    Well I did read it. And I don't advertise my current clearances and if anyone is muppet enough to do so then that's a whole other story.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Take my obligations seriously because I have a linkined profile? Because I participate on a online forum? Little England at it's finest.

    If the authority cannot determine or use reason and good judgement about the suitability of a candidate they probably should look for a new job themselves.
    Well done. Now try reading the article and then reply.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by Ticktock View Post
    If you don't want to take your obligations seriously then don't be surprised if you find yourself rejected at some point in the future.

    This was posted recently: MoD warns contractors about security clearance forums :: Contractor UK

    As it states, the simple fact that people with certain skill sets hold or are applying for SC can yield intelligence.
    Take my obligations seriously because I have a linkined profile? Because I participate on a online forum? Little England at it's finest.

    If the authority cannot determine or use reason and good judgement about the suitability of a candidate they probably should look for a new job themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Calm down James Bond. It's not MiB.

    Too many folks read SC and think 'secret' when it's 9 times out of 10 it's nothing of the sort. A best for many it's Commercial in Confidence or Restricted material. For the majority the MoD is only looking to verify you're not in the position or likely to be in the position of being manipulated, bent, mangled or coerced to exchanging sensitive information.

    I'll tell you another. I've worked on project here in Germany without the clearance. The exact same project I had worked on in the UK a couple of years earlier where I was required to be DV cleared.
    If you don't want to take your obligations seriously then don't be surprised if you find yourself rejected at some point in the future.

    This was posted recently: MoD warns contractors about security clearance forums :: Contractor UK

    As it states, the simple fact that people with certain skill sets hold or are applying for SC can yield intelligence.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    I thought one of the first rules of SC was that you weren't supposed to publicly discuss your application for or possession of it

    (Obviously you are posting anonymously, but even so, mistakes can be made and your real life ID narrowed down or disclosed .. )
    Calm down James Bond. It's not MiB.

    Too many folks read SC and think 'secret' when it's 9 times out of 10 it's nothing of the sort. A best for many it's Commercial in Confidence or Restricted material. For the majority the MoD is only looking to verify you're not in the position or likely to be in the position of being manipulated, bent, mangled or coerced to exchanging sensitive information.

    I'll tell you another. I've worked on project here in Germany without the clearance. The exact same project I had worked on in the UK a couple of years earlier where I was required to be DV cleared.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Depends what country you're applying in.

    When applying for NATO SC here, the German NSA (National Security Authority) had to be used to go via Abbeywood. No biggy.

    Interestingly the relationships between some countries are impacting individuals such as ourselves, myself most recently.

    Germany is less the pleased about the activities of GCHQ and to my astonishment my clearance application was being dragged on and on, excuse after excuse from Abbeywood. Eventually I learnt from an AW spokesperson they've not been getting on well with the German NSA recently.

    The stupid part of it all was that the job was a European project servicing the interests of both countries.

    I let the job go in the end as offers from others came in. Needless to say the other agency was pissed.
    I thought one of the first rules of SC was that you weren't supposed to publicly discuss your application for or possession of it

    (Obviously you are posting anonymously, but even so, mistakes can be made and your real life ID narrowed down or disclosed .. )

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Depends what country you're applying in.

    When applying for NATO SC here, the German NSA (National Security Authority) had to be used to go via Abbeywood. No biggy.

    Interestingly the relationships between some countries are impacting individuals such as ourselves, myself most recently.

    Germany is less the pleased about the activities of GCHQ and to my astonishment my clearance application was being dragged on and on, excuse after excuse from Abbeywood. Eventually I learnt from an AW spokesperson they've not been getting on well with the German NSA recently.

    The stupid part of it all was that the job was a European project servicing the interests of both countries.

    I let the job go in the end as offers from others came in. Needless to say the other agency was pissed.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    I've just applied for a gig working on a greenfield project called "System zarządzania wykop". Anyone got any info on this?
    Crikey - So presumably NATO is planning an invasion of Zarządzania

    Things are really hotting up in Eastern Europe!

    Leave a comment:


  • chef
    replied
    google translate:

    System zarządzania wykop = polish for "Management System trench"

    perhaps as it involves NATO and a trench then the world war thread might be better suited

    Leave a comment:


  • Scruff
    replied
    Location? Mons, Belgium? I have been approached a few times about roles there, but the rates suck (less than London) and the expenses policy not too clear (erm, they might pay expenses).

    For roles nearer the north part of the Black Sea, see the World War (i) thread
    Last edited by Scruff; 3 March 2014, 14:48. Reason: Spelling...

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    started a topic NATO SC

    NATO SC

    Has anyone had this? What is the application process like? Is terminal illness likely to count against me?

    I've just applied for a gig working on a greenfield project called "System zarządzania wykop". Anyone got any info on this?

Working...
X