Originally posted by EternalOptimist
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: stats question
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "stats question"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by vetran View Postits higher but still infinitesimally small. That is how evolution works, enough people throw themselves off buildings then one of them who has a deformity such as webbed fingers survives and impregnates all the females.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Postif you jump off a tall building, the chances you can fly are X
if you jump with five mates, the chances of one of you flying is higher ?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Postif you go out on your own on Friday night the chance of you getting laid is X, if you go out with five mates the chance of one of you getting laid is higher?
no one on CUK has 5 real mates
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
Why are unlikely results more probable when carried out at once?
Statisticians use the Poisson distribution to measure this frequency for a given window of time.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Postif you go out on your own on Friday night the chance of you getting laid is X, if you go out with five mates the chance of one of you getting laid is higher?
if you jump with five mates, the chances of one of you flying is higher ?
Leave a comment:
-
if you go out on your own on Friday night the chance of you getting laid is X, if you go out with five mates the chance of one of you getting laid is higher?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
Why are unlikely results more probable when carried out at once?
I wish sas was here.....
That's assuming you understand the principle of generating small amounts of finite improbability by simply hooking the logic circuits of a Bambleweeny 57 Sub-Meson Brain to an atomic vector plotter suspended in a strong Brownian Motion producer (say a nice hot cup of tea)
Leave a comment:
-
not a stats answer but Heisenberg reckoned that the observer affected the results of the experiment.
just doing the experiment affects the the results of doing the experiment
Leave a comment:
-
To keep it in context - if I flip a coin 6 times there is a specific probability that I'll get 6 heads in a row (1/64 in I think). That's the same for you, me and everyone else on the planet assuming other variables are constant and each flip is a genuine 50/50.
However, if I get 30 people to flip a coin 6 times, the probability that SOMEBODY will get 6 heads in a row is higher than 1/64.
(I hope that's right anyway)Last edited by vwdan; 26 February 2014, 12:44.
Leave a comment:
-
If twenty million people play the lottery, there's a better chance of someone winning the jackpot than if only one person plays. And if only one person plays, the jackpot wouldn't be worth winning and they'd be pretty pissed off.
Leave a comment:
-
stats question
BBC News - Higgs boson-like particle discovery claimed at LHC
Particle physics has an accepted definition for a "discovery": a five-sigma level of certainty
The number of standard deviations, or sigmas, is a measure of how unlikely it is that an experimental result is simply down to chance, in the absence of a real effect
Similarly, tossing a coin and getting a number of heads in a row may just be chance, rather than a sign of a "loaded" coin
The "three sigma" level represents about the same likelihood of tossing nine heads in a row
Five sigma, on the other hand, would correspond to tossing more than 21 in a row
Unlikely results are more probable when several experiments are carried out at once - equivalent to several people flipping coins at the same time
Why are unlikely results more probable when carried out at once?
I wish sas was here.....
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Yesterday 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
- Will HMRC’s 9% interest rate bully you into submission? Nov 5 09:10
- Business Account with ANNA Money Nov 1 15:51
- Autumn Budget 2024: Reeves raids contractor take-home pay Oct 31 14:11
- How Autumn Budget 2024 affects homes, property and mortgages Oct 31 09:23
- Autumn Budget 2024: Reeves raids contractor take-home pay Oct 31 09:20
- Autumn Budget 2024: Umbrella companies hit, Employer NICs hiked, and BADR heading for 18% Oct 30 16:54
- Autumn Budget 2024: chancellor’s full speech Oct 30 16:34
Leave a comment: