- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Le Diner de Con (sp?)
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Le Diner de Con (sp?)"
Collapse
-
I noted the original post date of this thread and feel I should apologise to Sas. A ten year old boy can be excused such things.
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostI guess they don't have the internet where you use CUK then? If it's not worth your time looking up the spelling, it's not worth out time to read. If someone wrote in txt-speak because they couldn't be bothered to write properly, you'd hardly be happy.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostTacking "sp?" on a word is the last refuge of the ignorant and lazy, an admission you can't spell and can't even be bothered to check.
If anyone was interested in watching the film I gave adequate information to find it.
But I suppose that the more cognitively challenged might need more hand-holding than I provided, thus proving that they are fit subjects for the film
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostHence the (sp?) you moron. I would definitely invite you. We could talk about foreign climes, how to figure out rep on CUK and a host of topics that would leave you floundering.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Pondlife View PostIs it an original of this? Dinner for Schmucks (2010) - IMDbPainfully unfunny. As a fan of Steve Carell and Paul Rudd (not to mention Jermaine Clement and Zak G) and sometimes of director Jay Roach, it's hard to reckon how none of these talented people noticed how strained, mean-spirited and downright ridiculous this comedy is. No one behaves like an actual human being, and Carell's "loser" character is so annoying you're insulted when the script asks us to find him lovable-- you'd rather strangle him. A deeply cynical, formulaic farce without a shred of anything resembling reality. Even the broadest comedy has to be based in some recognizable behavior. It mocks the bad corporate villains for making fun of the fools invited to the party, and does the same thing itself. A few scattered laughs is the best you can hope for. What a waste of talented people. The producers should be spanked.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostI guess they don't have the internet where you use CUK then? If it's not worth your time looking up the spelling, it's not worth out time to read. If someone wrote in txt-speak because they couldn't be bothered to write properly, you'd hardly be happy.:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostHence the (sp?) you moron.
Leave a comment:
-
I've got a 27' Colvic northerner motor sailor. Two full headroom cabins forrard and a double berth sleeping cabin aft, plus a fully water tight cockpit. You could find one in your price range
Leave a comment:
-
I've seen it. Tres amusamt.
The tax inspector gets the last laugh, I think, which is appropriate for a contractors' forum.
Leave a comment:
-
ah yes
Chico
Franco
David J Contractor
Jibber
legends
but who is the Kn0bend(sp?) Sasguru
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostVery sloppy, for a title especially - Not only did Sas skip the "s" from "Cons" but he forgot or hadn't noticed the tin hat over the "i".
Le Dîner de Cons (1998)
I reckon Sas himself would be a prize guest of honour one week
Leave a comment:
-
Very sloppy, for a title especially - Not only did Sas skip the "s" from "Cons" but he forgot or hadn't noticed the tin hat over the "i".
Le Dîner de Cons (1998)
I reckon Sas himself would be a prize guest of honour one week
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: