Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
I must confess I see it a bit differently, and I doubt Cameron will lose much sleep over it. The LibDems used to be the party of the protest and anti-Tory votes, but being in power themselves now, UKIP is wearing their cap.
The likes of Wythenshawe would vote for Jimmy Saville if he stood against the Tories.
Hi DS!
Wishful thinking on my part I suppose.
I'm just deluded with our current crop of politicos that's all. Rotten to the core, the whole lot of 'em.
It's insignificant in a by-election; there are always major swings against the government of the day in by-elections, because many people can't be arsed to turn up, and others just use it to vent their frustration with any real risk of putting the people they hate in power. Plus, 14% of not very much is not very much.
Mich - as I keep saying (and this'll be the 3rd time) it wasn't a 14% swing from the government of the day was it?
Edit: though I didnt see the 28% turnout statistic. I guess that puts a slightly different perspective on it.
Last edited by Gittins Gal; 14 February 2014, 10:24.
Yes, but this is such a safe labour seat that nobody was voting for the party in power anyway.
UKIP increased their vote by 14%.
It's a kick in the teeth for Camoron anyhow...
Hi GG!
I must confess I see it a bit differently, and I doubt Cameron will lose much sleep over it. The LibDems used to be the party of the protest and anti-Tory votes, but being in power themselves now, UKIP is wearing their cap.
The likes of Wythenshawe would vote for Jimmy Saville if he stood against the Tories.
UKIP push Tories into 3rd place with 18%of vote in Wythenshawe by-election.
Not a bad result for them at all considering that this is a very safe labour seat and the by-election wasn't the result of some scandal involving the sitting MP which would result in a large protest vote against the incumbent party.
Actually, I'd forgotten all about it until I found it buried away in a corner of the Telegraph this morning. They're not giving the story much prominence. Wonder why ?
A 28% turnout Sssssishhhh!!! I'm sure that's not important.
Well a 14% swing to UKIP (and it's safe to assume that a significant proportion of this came from the labour vote) is significant IMO. I mean, UKIP - the party of right wing, frothing at the mouth Tories
It's insignificant in a by-election; there are always major swings against the government of the day in by-elections, because many people can't be arsed to turn up, and others just use it to vent their frustration with any real risk of putting the people they hate in power. Plus, 14% of not very much is not very much.
It's a by-election, not an election. A chance to kick the government up the bum without any consequences.
Well a 14% swing to UKIP (and it's safe to assume that a significant proportion of this came from the labour vote) is significant IMO. I mean, UKIP - the party of right wing, frothing at the mouth Tories
People always vote against the party in power in bi-elections, and this time there's two of them. Which makes this the best oppurtunity the likes of UKIP will ever have to get an MP - and they failed, by a huge margin. Not quite sure that counts as a success.
Yes, but this is such a safe labour seat that nobody was voting for the party in power anyway.
People always vote against the party in power in bi-elections, and this time there's two of them. Which makes this the best oppurtunity the likes of UKIP will ever have to get an MP - and they failed, by a huge margin. Not quite sure that counts as a success.
UKIP push Tories into 3rd place with 18%of vote in Wythenshawe by-election.
Not a bad result for them at all considering that this is a very safe labour seat and the by-election wasn't the result of some scandal involving the sitting MP which would result in a large protest vote against the incumbent party.
Actually, I'd forgotten all about it until I found it buried away in a corner of the Telegraph this morning. not giving the story much prominence.
I'm suprised that the Tories even got 18% in Wythenshaw. Its a tulip hole and a typical Labour safe seat - everybody being poor and living on the state. Turkeys don't vote for Christmas in the same way that this lot would never vote Tory. The fact that Wythenshaw has always been a toilet and their historical Labour vote has not changed this seems lost on them.
Leave a comment: