I'm looking forward to the first race more than I have done in years.
Currently the cars look as reliable as a Suity project so I think the flatbed removal lorry could be the winner.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: New F1 2014 cars
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "New F1 2014 cars"
Collapse
-
Oi, bloody plagiarist BBC:
Originally posted by d000hg View Post8:55 This one looks like it was designed using toilet rolls and old cardboard boxesWho knew they read CUKOriginally posted by Andrew Benson, Chief F1 writer
Leave a comment:
-
It's has always been part of the sport...Brawn won the championship as he spotted a 'hole' in the regulations that allowed him to develop the split diffusser...more downforce with less tyre wear gave him a winning car.Originally posted by AtW View PostCould not FIA mandate heavy duty lasers at certain height at the finishing line or something? Rules should be enforced or they are worthless...
Trouble is they are backed up against a money starved sport and if it gets too expensive to work/develop it collapses.
Leave a comment:
-
Could not FIA mandate heavy duty lasers at certain height at the finishing line or something? Rules should be enforced or they are worthless...Originally posted by Damon View PostThe original aim of the change is to bring the height of the drivers feet lower but as usual the F1 teams have been able to 'interpret' the loose FIA technical regulation.
Leave a comment:
-
Apart from Mercedes and Ferrari who have developed 'functioning' end noses the rest have just added cosmetic protrusions to get them past the new regulations for end nose height and the race stewards/scrutineers. Most are in aero function very similar to their 2013 car.
They are within the 'spirit' of the regulation only.
The original aim of the change is to bring the height of the drivers feet lower but as usual the F1 teams have been able to 'interpret' the loose FIA technical regulation.
Leave a comment:
-
-
nope its the hedge fund / investment company that has ended up with a company they can't afford.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostIs the main sponsor of the second car run by someone with dyslexia?
The lotus is a complaint waiting to happen as you are supposed to have a front nose and it has two (although the one of the left sticks slightly further out than the one on the right to meet the letter of the law).
Leave a comment:
-
Is the main sponsor of the second car run by someone with dyslexia?
Leave a comment:
-
New F1 2014 cars
This one looks like it was designed using toilet rolls and old cardboard boxes:

This one is rather fetching though:
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The weird, the wonderful and the genuinely useful: what contractors get wrong about expenses Today 06:00
- Right to Work changes from October 2026: a contractor’s explainer Yesterday 15:46
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Yesterday 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Sep 1 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08

Leave a comment: