- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Lord Rennard - Should he apologise?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Lord Rennard - Should he apologise?"
Collapse
-
I touched up the company sec. in the kitchen at lunch time. She didn't seem to mind at all.
-
I bet he has fantasies about Princes Leia being chained to his neck.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostOr maybe it's just "balance of probabilities"...
He should have done his non-apology apology a couple of weeks ago and he would have still been a Lib Dim peer. He could have even got help from a publicist to learn how to act sincere....
Leave a comment:
-
There's a certain schadenfreude when the political elite's own foul excrement enters their food chain.
Leave a comment:
-
Guilty until proven innocent from the party that like to go on about civil liberties?
Leave a comment:
-
e's been suspended. Dirty fecker's probably got a hard on over it. Should have withdrawn the whip.
Leave a comment:
-
You had to hitchhike round Italy in the 70s. So many hands on my balls my jeans were shiny.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostI think the problem with this whole debate is what, these days, constitutes 'inappropriate' behaviour? Could that be something as simple as putting a hand on a knee? It might make some women feel slightly uncomfortable but it cannot be construed as an offence and therefore the perpetrator cannot be prosecuted. I think if politicians apologised every time they offended someone's sensibilities they wouldn't have any time to make a mess of the country.
In my day instances of inappropriate behaviour were dealt with by a strategically placed elbow
I think I touched my female staff member (other than on the hand) twice in 8 years one hug when a relative died and one hug at her leaving do. anything else was completely accidental and obviously so.
Other managers do touch but I find it odd, its so easy to upset someone.
Leave a comment:
-
I think the problem with this whole debate is what, these days, constitutes 'inappropriate' behaviour? Could that be something as simple as putting a hand on a knee? It might make some women feel slightly uncomfortable but it cannot be construed as an offence and therefore the perpetrator cannot be prosecuted. I think if politicians apologised every time they offended someone's sensibilities they wouldn't have any time to make a mess of the country.
In my day instances of inappropriate behaviour were dealt with by a strategically placed elbow
Leave a comment:
-
If I had a pound for everytime a bird had pinched me bum, I'd have two pound fifty.
If they had chained me to the bed and forced me to do 'fings' to them, that would be different, that would be grounds , that would
Leave a comment:
-
If the guy really believes he's done nothing wrong, what value would an apology be to anyone, aside from the political needs?
Leave a comment:
-
He's innocent in the legal sense of innocent until proven guilty. However the enquiry found compelling evidence of inappropriate behaviour, that did not rise to the level required for a prosecution to stand a good chance of securing a conviction. He sees this as exoneration, therefore no apology is required. However the very same enquiry that he claims 'cleared' him also recommended that an apology would be appropriate. He wants it both ways (no jokes pls). Its all about the message that him carrying on apparently uncontrite would send on the party's position (no jokes again) on sexual harrassment; Cleggy needs to stamp his authority on ..... oh dear
Hi, I'm Chris, 53, built for comfort, married, and a major player in Lib Dem politics. Want to see my manifesto?
Mmmm take me now, big boy;
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Today 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Yesterday 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Leave a comment: