Reply to: Is this such a bad thing?

[d000hg]

Taking emotion out of the equation, DA has a point...
A lot of people carry on existing long after they get any enjoyment out of life.

For many, that starts in their twenties. Look at the miseries on CUK for instance!

[Mich the Tester]

Dunno about that, but I do know I really really don't want to carry on if it means living with increasing disability/mental confusion in some coffin dodger home wearing nappies.

Grannytester ended up that way. She was only cheered up by Nephewtester smuggling in a bottle of sherry every day.

[Old Greg]

Dunno about that, but I do know I really really don't want to carry on if it means living with increasing disability/mental confusion in some coffin dodger home wearing nappies.

Getting your morning meds and posting on CUK about whether it's too early for champagne.

[vetran]

AND Jenny Agutter taking her top off.

I see your taking the top off and raise you the shower scene from American Werewolf.

[pjclarke]

it depicts a dystopic ageist future society in which both population and the consumption of resources are maintained in equilibrium by requiring the death of everyone reaching a particular age.

AND Jenny Agutter taking her top off.

[Old Greg]

Taking emotion out of the equation, DA has a point...
A lot of people carry on existing long after they get any enjoyment out of life, especially when you chip in the usual crop of illnesses, infirmity of body and mind etc. NOTE - I do not mean all people, many can derive significant pleasure still.
In addition, the demographic timebomb means we cant afford all these people, especially those who have not had chance to save for the future or didn't bother.
As with heatwaves in France, you get a bump during these spells but cant help thinking things are slightly accelerated rather than cutting decades off peoples lives.

So who gets to decide whether it is worth a person (who has the mental capacity to make a decision) carrying on living?

[lukemg]

Taking emotion out of the equation, DA has a point...
A lot of people carry on existing long after they get any enjoyment out of life, especially when you chip in the usual crop of illnesses, infirmity of body and mind etc. NOTE - I do not mean all people, many can derive significant pleasure still.
In addition, the demographic timebomb means we cant afford all these people, especially those who have not had chance to save for the future or didn't bother.
As with heatwaves in France, you get a bump during these spells but cant help thinking things are slightly accelerated rather than cutting decades off peoples lives.

[socialworker]

I am planning to go at around 75, 80 tops.

[Old Greg]

Logans run had an interesting idea: , it depicts a dystopic ageist future society in which both population and the consumption of resources are maintained in equilibrium by requiring the death of everyone reaching a particular age.

Woof!

[DodgyAgent]

Logans run had an interesting idea: , it depicts a dystopic ageist future society in which both population and the consumption of resources are maintained in equilibrium by requiring the death of everyone reaching a particular age.

[Old Greg]

He's probably attacking the wrong dude on Twitter right now. And asking for two references.

What do you expect from a burnt out stunt dog cock?

[Cliphead]

Is that dog porn years?



Edit: I can see the Christmas misery biography now:

He's probably attacking the wrong dude on Twitter right now. And asking for two references.

[Old Greg]

Porn years surely

Is that dog porn years?



Edit: I can see the Christmas misery biography now:

Dodgy Agent: The Dog Porn Years

[amcdonald]

Is that dog years?

Porn years surely

[Old Greg]

69

Is that dog years?