- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Could you pass a Cambridge University interview?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostI got 100%. But... I did know some of the answers already. (I passed a Cambridge interview in 1987 - and went to Oxford instead).*
* Only one the facts in that sentence is true.Last edited by KentPhilip; 25 October 2013, 09:05.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MyUserName View PostYou knew some of the answers already?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostI got 100%. But... I did know some of the answers already. (I passed a Cambridge interview in 1987 - and went to Oxford instead).*
* Only one the facts in that sentence is true.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KentPhilip View PostI got 80%
But then I DID pass a Cambridge interview, back in 1988
* Only one the facts in that sentence is true.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by doodab View PostThe air has more inertia than the balloon
Driving a Car with a Helium Balloon: Physics - YouTube
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by doodab View PostReally?
The pedantic issue I am getting at is it depends upon the definition of negligible, that would normally be defined as having no bearing on the required precision of the result. However since it is "some" the 2/3 and 1/3 cannot be satisfied unless both have had the same number of turns.
Sure, it tends to 2/3 and 1/3 which is how I would have been required to write the answer.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Postbut wouldn't inertia effectively make the balloon appear to go backwards? Depends if the air pressure is greater than inertial forces?
A better example is here:
Einstein: The elevator, the rocket, and gravity: the equivalence principle
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostImagine the air was water, which would all want to slosh to the back, making the balloon "float" to the front, as the truck lurched forward
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostI'm not smart enough..
Could you pass a Cambridge University interview? - Telegraph
Lost on this question:
Q.8 An unbiased cubic die has numbers 1 to 6 inscribed on each side. On average, how many rolls will you need in order to get a 6?
Well I answered 1 instead of 6 given that the numbers 1 through 6 and inscribed on each side? But no...
Thickos can't even write the question properly.
If I would have hit it a bit harder I would definitely have got position on the pink and then potted the black
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostI got q7 wrong - (and many others) but this one puzzled me. ..
If the guy at the back sees two red hats then he can deduce his is green and call that out. So from his silence, the two guys in front of him know that they don't both have red hats.
But that being so, if the middle guy sees the front guy wearing a red hat he knows his own hat must then be green, and _he_ can call out.
So if neither of these guys calls out, the guy at the front can conclude he is not wearing a red hat (as the preceding two cases cover all possibilities of the front two guys with the front one wearing a red hat, namely front/middle = red/red or red/green).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostAs the only possible solution to let anyone know their hat colour would be that the prisoner at the back can see 2 red hats and thus knows his hat is green
The guy at the front knows this, so he knows his hat isn't red.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Yesterday 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Leave a comment: