• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Every breath you take...I'll be watching you ...."

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Wonder if it would have helped here?

    Angel of Woolwich 'threatened with arrest after she reprimanded boys who threw eggs at her home' | Mail Online

    Ingrid Loyau-Kennett, 48, confronted soldier Lee Rigby's alleged killer seconds after he was slaughtered
    Claims she was threatened with arrest herself after a group of young boys began pelting her house with eggs and stones
    Confronted boys who she claims 'shouted at her' and ran away
    Police deny she was threatened with arrest but said she was given advice about her behaviour
    Teacher says the attention she received after soldier's death has made her a target for abuse


    Devon and Cornwall Police confirmed they were called out and a woman was given advice about her behaviour - but denied she was threatened with arrest.

    A spokesman said: 'At no point was she threatened with an arrest. The policemen gave the woman advice and left it at that. It is not appropriate to comment any further on the matter.

    'We are aware of community tensions on the estate and are stepping up patrols with a visibility police presence.'

    One neighbour, who witnessed the dispute, said: 'She went outside and confronted them and there was a very heated argument - insults flying about all over the place. I tried to calm things down but it just got worse.'

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    And don't forget: 20% of nothing is nothing.
    Good point

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Who decides what is and is not "nothing"?
    And don't forget: 20% of nothing is nothing.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    If you've nothing to hide...
    Who decides what is and is not "nothing"?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    If you've nothing to hide...
    you have everything to fear.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Whoever "they" decide is guilty...
    Of people filmed committing crimes. Be they Police or Public.

    Fitting people up (which has always happened) will become more difficult. Just as CCTV has prevented many miscarriages of justice including Plebgate.

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Do you threaten to shoot many people?
    Now, my prefered weapon is a sword rather than a gun tbh.

    Never actually got to threaten to shoot anyone thought Did training with SA80s etc but never actually used them in a real situation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by DirtyDog View Post
    Of who?
    Whoever "they" decide is guilty...

    Leave a comment:


  • DirtyDog
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Halo has a point, though I think the use of cameras will bring higher conviction rates.
    Of who?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Halo has a point, though I think the use of cameras will bring higher conviction rates.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Halo Jones View Post
    With the advent of wearable technology such as google glass, everyone will be recording everything.

    The police will then start recording to counteract public recordings / accusations

    It seems a bit Orwellian & a concern is that everyone will start acting nice in public out of fear, which will lead to repressed resentment, which in turn leads to all sorts of mental tulip
    If you've nothing to hide...

    Leave a comment:


  • Halo Jones
    replied
    With the advent of wearable technology such as google glass, everyone will be recording everything.

    The police will then start recording to counteract public recordings / accusations

    It seems a bit Orwellian & a concern is that everyone will start acting nice in public out of fear, which will lead to repressed resentment, which in turn leads to all sorts of mental tulip

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    The local litter wardens already have shoulder/chest mounted cameras. They wander around the highstreet issuing £75 fines for anyone dropping a fag end.

    Is there a down side?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    I often wandered why they don't have cameras or something on their guns?

    All the time though, I guess it might be good idea as it will help with clarifying what happened. Sounds like it might be harsh for the police though - presumably only relevant bits will be accessed and videos of them on the toilet etc will not start appearing on the web.
    I am sort of expecting the recording to be encrypted and accessible only by authorised personnel.

    It would fix stop & search being racially biased and I was tasered / assaulted a police office while unconscious events.

    not that when caught red handed the Police would actually fire anyone.

    Agree on the guns, I can't understand why the minute it comes off safety it doesn't start recording.

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Because then they would have to keep pointing their guns at people?
    Yes but that is already standard procedure when you are threatening to shoot someone.

    At least it was the last time I was doing it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X