I teach ethics to bankers
It's part of a course I do occasional lectures on.
I use piss like this as a worked example:
You meet a girl in a pub.
She says "you're better looking than my boyfriend, I'll chuck him, he's tulip in bed anyway". She phones him, tells some lies about going out late with some female friends and then puts her arm around you.
Many of us would then quite happily then spend the evening back at our place discussing feminist poetry.
Few of us would see this as a prospect for a long term relationship, there may be some trust issues, even if we are better looking and wonderful in bed.
Same with a recruiter or anyone else you do business with.
If the transaction is finite and you don't need to trust them much,then their ethics don't have to be your problem.
But although a contract recruiter is unlikely to be your best man when you marry the girl you met in the bar, you are trusting him with non-trivial amounts of money.
As a pimp, I'm not going to try and claim some moral superiority that dictates you should not shaft your current client, I'm asking if you trust this creature with two months pay ?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Agent sleaze number 107
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Agent sleaze number 107"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by original PM View Postthing is why care - more and more 'people' are seen as expendable commodities - you watch first thing any venture capitalist will do is get rid of half the workforce - forget the fact that some may have been loyal for 5-10-15 years and gone over and above what was required and deserve better.
It seems people on here are hyper-cynical for the sake of it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostI've read this twice and I'm still not sure - are you defending such behaviour by employees?
If so, doesn't it breed unprofessionalism, and moreover, the next generation of bad employers?
Business is now all about making as much money as possible for yourself and fck everyone else (has this allways been the case - you could argue yes).
So in essence we need to see ourseleves as businesses and take everyone for what we can get and fck everyone else
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DieScum View PostAgent: So we want to put you forward for this role but your availability is a problem.
Me: Well, as I said to your colleague I'm currently contracted till the end of December. I've committed to stay to the end of this project. This new role sounds great, and you'll have a hard time finding those niche skills, but if they can't wait two months then I'm not interested.
Agent: Well we can look at your current contract for you. There are always loopholes. Even if you are under contract they'll never sue if you leave early.
Me: ...
Agent: And you don't want to be looking for a new role round christmas. You'll find it hard to find anything at all.
Me: ...
It's depressing dealing with these kind of people.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Platypus View PostExactly so. I've seen how my kids have been treated by employers. I used to think it was shocking that young people would take days off without phoning in sick, leave a job not by resigning but by stopping showing up, generally skive. Now I think that what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, i.e. treat people like tulip, expect to be treated like tulip.
If so, doesn't it breed unprofessionalism, and moreover, the next generation of bad employers?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Postunfortunately its an attitude that comes from many employers as well.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostI agree we do now live in age where morality, commitment and your word ain't worth jack tulip
if there is money to be made and the contract has a loop hole then it is done.
fck morals
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostWNLUKS
I've been asked before to jump - just say "No".
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostUnfortunately there are many contractors that will jump at the drop of a hat so unfortunately our community is the cause for this attitude. It isn't always the agents fault.
I don't see what you are moaning about here.
I've been asked before to jump - just say "No".
Leave a comment:
-
I agree we do now live in age where morality, commitment and your word ain't worth jack tulip
if there is money to be made and the contract has a loop hole then it is done.
fck morals
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DieScum View PostAgent: So we want to put you forward for this role but your availability is a problem.
Me: Well, as I said to your colleague I'm currently contracted till the end of December. I've committed to stay to the end of this project. This new role sounds great, and you'll have a hard time finding those niche skills, but if they can't wait two months then I'm not interested.
Agent: Well we can look at your current contract for you. There are always loopholes. Even if you are under contract they'll never sue if you leave early.
Me: ...
Agent: And you don't want to be looking for a new role round christmas. You'll find it hard to find anything at all.
Me: ...
It's depressing dealing with these kind of people.
I don't see what you are moaning about here.
Leave a comment:
-
Don't let it get to you. Explaining that you have loyalty or a desire to see things through to the end will not really translate to that type of agent.
Leave a comment:
-
Agent sleaze number 107
Agent: So we want to put you forward for this role but your availability is a problem.
Me: Well, as I said to your colleague I'm currently contracted till the end of December. I've committed to stay to the end of this project. This new role sounds great, and you'll have a hard time finding those niche skills, but if they can't wait two months then I'm not interested.
Agent: Well we can look at your current contract for you. There are always loopholes. Even if you are under contract they'll never sue if you leave early.
Me: ...
Agent: And you don't want to be looking for a new role round christmas. You'll find it hard to find anything at all.
Me: ...
It's depressing dealing with these kind of people.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: