• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Petition to randomly reorder all posts in the Counting Thread"

Collapse

  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    I have suggested editing all posts after one is deleted, but clearly he's not that committed to the cause.
    One could say he's a fair weather OCD'er.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    But it's better IMO if he believes there's a solution.
    I have suggested editing all posts after one is deleted, but clearly he's not that committed to the cause.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    I prefer my tactic of randomly deleting older posts so it becomes out of step
    But it's better IMO if he believes there's a solution.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    I prefer my tactic of randomly deleting older posts so it becomes out of step
    14109

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    I prefer my tactic of randomly deleting older posts so it becomes out of step

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Don't reorder them all. Just swap two and announce this but don't say which ones.
    Don't swap any and announce that you have swapped two.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Don't reorder them all. Just swap two and announce this but don't say which ones.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Maybe just reordering Brillo's posts would be best, so he would have to go back in and edit them.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    You see there is the difference. Reordering would be funny, deleting just cruel.

    Either will just result in a new thread being started so really what would be the point....
    How about hiding the numbers all over existing posts in a Bad Wolf kind of 11272 way. Lest that way 3625 Brillo can spend his days 98 looking for them across all of CUK and time.




























    7621

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    A conscience vote.
    You see there is the difference. Reordering would be funny, deleting just cruel.

    Either will just result in a new thread being started so really what would be the point....

    Leave a comment:


  • Petition to randomly reorder all posts in the Counting Thread

    9
    No
    11.11%
    1
    AndyW
    33.33%
    3
    Yes
    55.56%
    5
    A conscience vote.

Working...
X