Originally posted by mudskipper
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Petition to randomly reorder all posts in the Counting Thread"
Collapse
-
I have suggested editing all posts after one is deleted, but clearly he's not that committed to the cause.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostBut it's better IMO if he believes there's a solution.
Leave a comment:
-
14109Originally posted by SimonMac View PostI prefer my tactic of randomly deleting older posts so it becomes out of step
Leave a comment:
-
I prefer my tactic of randomly deleting older posts so it becomes out of step
Leave a comment:
-
Don't reorder them all. Just swap two and announce this but don't say which ones.
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe just reordering Brillo's posts would be best, so he would have to go back in and edit them.
Leave a comment:
-
How about hiding the numbers all over existing posts in a Bad Wolf kind of 11272 way. Lest that way 3625 Brillo can spend his days 98 looking for them across all of CUK and time.Originally posted by eek View PostYou see there is the difference. Reordering would be funny, deleting just cruel.
Either will just result in a new thread being started so really what would be the point....
7621
Leave a comment:
-
Petition to randomly reorder all posts in the Counting Thread
9No11.11%1AndyW33.33%3Yes55.56%5A conscience vote.
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Today 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Yesterday 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Leave a comment: