• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Letzgo Hunting - anything wrong with that?"

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    And thanks to all the woolly minded liberals around the UK (and particularly on CUK) this is what happens :-

    British children targeted for online sex blackmail because UK is so liberal - Telegraph

    As I found out a few years ago, most in the UK don't give a stuff about kids. They care far more about animal rights. And even that is well behind the economy. Never mind if kids are getting abused if people can earn another few quid.

    Yet another reason why Asia shows the way forward.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by bobspud View Post
    sorry have we changed the subject to dogging?
    I thought you wanted the pedos to see your honey trap. An appropriate term in the circumstances.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by bobspud View Post
    Whats the lesson we should learn? Do you not stop to think that many of these people get/got away with it precisely because people faced with the accusation don't have the courage to tackle it expressly for the reason that its going to cause an almighty storm of megatulip proportions and the idea of getting it wrong is just too scary to mention?

    How would you want to be treated if your ex decided to use "He's interfered with the kids" as the nuclear weapon against you?
    Once that button is pushed, your life is over regardless of the facts. I can say that because I know a chap that got accused of exactly that by his ex-wife. He had to watch his own fathers face as he was led into the docks at Bristol over the summer. Its been dis-proven but you can't take back the hurt it has caused or the doubt now its planted.

    The rhetoric needs winding down by a significant margin.
    WHS++++

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    Originally posted by Ticktock View Post
    And fat bears.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobspud
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    So Bob is going to dress up as a child and setup with back door open and goods on display?
    sorry have we changed the subject to dogging?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    A honeypot is no way to catch criminals, you simply entrap the curious
    And fat bears.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Just for gathering evidence. And only because the police aren't doing their job.

    And honeytraps are quite legal. Police often setup lorries with back door open and boxes of goods on display. Then nab anyone who has a go.
    So Bob is going to dress up as a child and setup with back door open and goods on display?

    Leave a comment:


  • bobspud
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    There needs to be help for children who end up suffering. Has Jimmy Savile taught us nothing?
    Whats the lesson we should learn? Do you not stop to think that many of these people get/got away with it precisely because people faced with the accusation don't have the courage to tackle it expressly for the reason that its going to cause an almighty storm of megatulip proportions and the idea of getting it wrong is just too scary to mention?

    How would you want to be treated if your ex decided to use "He's interfered with the kids" as the nuclear weapon against you?
    Once that button is pushed, your life is over regardless of the facts. I can say that because I know a chap that got accused of exactly that by his ex-wife. He had to watch his own fathers face as he was led into the docks at Bristol over the summer. Its been dis-proven but you can't take back the hurt it has caused or the doubt now its planted.

    The rhetoric needs winding down by a significant margin.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I disagree. Until the police setup their own honeypot unit.
    A honeypot is no way to catch criminals, you simply entrap the curious

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I agree entirely. It should be easy to go to your doctor and opt for chemical castration.

    Though I have a huge amount of sympathy for the victims.
    That's probably the kind of response that dissuades them from going to the doc.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post

    There needs to be help for children who end up suffering. Has Jimmy Savile taught us nothing?
    Only get caught after you die?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    ...and perhaps from many people a slightly more rational attitude toward these issues? Firstly, accept that suspicion does not equal guilt, and secondly understand that while there's so much fury around it'll be damn near impossible to persuade people with paedophile feelings to go and get help or assist in researching the issue.

    Yes, it's appalling, but there are lots of appalling things that people do, and the key to reducing that is to understand what leads them to do those things.
    I agree entirely. It should be easy to go to your doctor and opt for chemical castration.

    Though I have a huge amount of sympathy for the victims.

    Leave a comment:


  • MaryPoppins
    replied
    What a sad story.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Which is why it would be better if the police did the evidence gathering.
    Indeed, and not vigilantes.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    But the fact is that he wasn't a nonce, he was accused by the public and took his own life, it raises the question for anonymity of suspects pre convition
    From the article :-
    But police said the 29-year-old had not been charged with any offences.

    The Leicestershire force would not say what crime Mr Cleary had been arrested on suspicion of, but confirmed he had been interviewed by officers and released on bail.

    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Yep, it's such an emotive subject that even entirely baseless suspicion can lead to lynchings.
    Which is why it would be better if the police did the evidence gathering.

    Originally posted by CoolCat View Post
    A guy in the North East who was arrested as a suspect in a kiddie fiddling case has his flat fire bombed. Subsequently it was proven he was very defintely not guilty. Still he was getting chased and had to leave town and so on.

    There really ought to be more help for folk in such a position.
    There needs to be help for children who end up suffering. Has Jimmy Savile taught us nothing?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X