Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
They don't want to replace wine with low-alcohol versions, they want low-alcohol versions to be classes AS wine - apparently they are not.
If you couldn't taste the difference I wouldn't object to having the option, but I think the alcohol provides part of the taste. We need Star Trek style synthohol
I have notice a tendency for "general" lager and bitters to be dropping in ABV
Isn't non-alcoholic beer taxed differently?
As for general beer strengths, they seem to be cyclical. When I was a kid I'm sure Heineken was 3.5%. Then for a while every lager was up to 5% a few years back, before they all launched fancy 4% versions. Fosters has I'm sure done a lot of ABV changes over the last decade - it was at 5% last time I saw it. Personally 5% is too strong for my taste, well I like 5% lager but not if I'm drinking more than one.
Leave a comment: