• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Ethical / legal / theological question"

Collapse

  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife...
    So he can lose said possession and give him something to moan about ad infinitum.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    ( For information and not NAT, an axiom or postulate is a universally accepted truth).
    It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife...

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    and...?

    I don't think so. I'm studying the Reformation(s) at the moment, and one of the major thrusts was the elimination of superstition from Christian practice.
    Oh the irony! So Augustine and his ilk rail against traditional (pagan) superstition compared with rational Christianity and then the Church he helped form is accused of superstition by later reformers.

    Trouble with your axioms is they are unknowable and require faith and as such do not actually qualify as axioms outside a faith community ( For information and not NAT, an axiom or postulate is a universally accepted truth).

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    I don't think Pelagius or Augustine would agree with you.
    and...?

    Anyway isn't religion basically philosophy supported by superstition?
    I don't think so. I'm studying the Reformation(s) at the moment, and one of the major thrusts was the elimination of superstition from Christian practice.

    I suppose it could depend on your definition of superstition. For me, superstition is like throwing salt over your shoulder if you spill it, fearing Friday the 13th - that kind of thing. Beliefs, but there not logically connected to anything else. The whole basis of theology is starting with axioms (like "God exists", "God cares about humanity" or whatever), and then exploring that logically and rationally.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    look, there have been a few comments over the past few weeks (and I havnt even been paying attention), but they seem to have gone over your head.
    Noone wishes you harm. but you have to listen to what others are saying
    Or on the other hand, it doesn't really matter.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    mythtery

    You're right though. Determinism vs freewill is a philosophical question, not religious.
    I don't think Pelagius or Augustine would agree with you.

    Anyway isn't religion basically philosophy supported by superstition?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post


    if that's the best you have, maybe you should stop playing with the big boys
    I prefer:

    Here's a ball.
    go play with it. The adults are talking.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    Yeah, sure you were. I have packing to do for a 5 day trip with the wife and kids but you and the other 'big boys' are welcome to keep up the name calling and insults on here whilst I am away if you want to really show your superiority.
    look, there have been a few comments over the past few weeks (and I havnt even been paying attention), but they seem to have gone over your head.
    Noone wishes you harm. but you have to listen to what others are saying

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    er...
    I was trying to say, politely, that you are dull, unimaginative, boorish and ever so slightly boring.
    and that your insults come from the 'ya-boo' playground and you lack any spark, initiative or originality

    I always prefer politeness, but if you want both barrells. you can have em

    bang bang



    Yeah, sure you were. I have packing to do for a 5 day trip with the wife and kids but you and the other 'big boys' are welcome to keep up the name calling and insults on here whilst I am away if you want to really show your superiority.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    You've got me there - clearly I am no match for you in the randomly insulting strangers on the internet game!



    If you honestly think that insulting a stranger anonymously over a web forum makes someone a 'big boy' then you have bigger problems than your lack of historical knowledge and being unable to admit you are wrong.
    er...
    I was trying to say, politely, that you are dull, unimaginative, boorish and ever so slightly boring.
    and that your insults come from the 'ya-boo' playground and you lack any spark, initiative or originality

    I always prefer politeness, but if you want both barrells. you can have em

    bang bang



    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Keep going. That is quite a record of consecutive dribble you are building.

    You've got me there - clearly I am no match for you in the randomly insulting strangers on the internet game!

    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post


    if that's the best you have, maybe you should stop playing with the big boys
    If you honestly think that insulting a stranger anonymously over a web forum makes someone a 'big boy' then you have bigger problems than your lack of historical knowledge and being unable to admit you are wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    Mainly because most pork is far more educated than you?


    if that's the best you have, maybe you should stop playing with the big boys

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    Mainly because most pork is far more educated than you?
    Keep going. That is quite a record of consecutive dribble you are building.

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    You can't educate Pork, regardless of how quickly you might try.

    Mainly because most pork is far more educated than you?

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    There is so much about life that must be unexpected to you. That will be your limited intellect allied to the fact that you are glacially slow on the uptake.

    HTH

    It is as fast as I need to be to stay well ahead of you.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X