• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Whatever happened to ...."

Collapse

  • MadDawg
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    ... UML?
    It got an icepick that made its ears burn.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    UML is still in use all the time. However of the 14 (or whatever) diagram types, probably about 3 are actually useful.

    Sequence diagrams actually show you something useful for instance. And ERDs are very useful for DB modeling, though I don't recall if they are technically UML.

    Roughly speaking, the more a UML looks like a normal diagram you might draw if you don't know UML, the better it is. The moment you start getting carried away which type of arrow-head to use, you're wasting time.
    WHS. BEML is far more universal than UML ever was.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    UML is still in use all the time. However of the 14 (or whatever) diagram types, probably about 3 are actually useful.

    Sequence diagrams actually show you something useful for instance. And ERDs are very useful for DB modeling, though I don't recall if they are technically UML.

    Roughly speaking, the more a UML looks like a normal diagram you might draw if you don't know UML, the better it is. The moment you start getting carried away which type of arrow-head to use, you're wasting time.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by GB9 View Post
    Use Case with a Stereotype of Business Process = User Story = Navigation Flow
    Use case with a Stereotype of System = System PBI = Function
    Package of the above = MMF = Module

    Nothing much changes, just the terminology.
    Ok draw me a state diagram in BPMN 2.0

    Horses for courses.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Oh I don't know, I once did an Agile project which included UML, pair programming, waterfall, scrums, AOA (any other acronym). I just ignored it all and was the only one on time...In fact the only project I've ever done with a PM, waste of time they are...
    +1.

    UML is great but it needs to come Threaded's time machine. It's not for the real world.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    ... UML?

    I remember when almost every job advert had "Must be proficient in UML".

    It was everywhere. Nothing could be done without stick men, activity diagrams, class diagrams, use cases written in nth detail.

    Then, one day, it just vanished....
    I was only telling someone earlier today how in my 17 years in the trade i'd avoided it for 15.5. Now I use it quite a bit

    Leave a comment:


  • GB9
    replied
    Use Case with a Stereotype of Business Process = User Story = Navigation Flow
    Use case with a Stereotype of System = System PBI = Function
    Package of the above = MMF = Module

    Nothing much changes, just the terminology.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    ... UML?

    I remember when almost every job advert had "Must be proficient in UML".

    It was everywhere. Nothing could be done without stick men, activity diagrams, class diagrams, use cases written in nth detail.

    Then, one day, it just vanished....
    All UML did was to give gainful employment to UML consultants and trainers. I think they've all moved to "Big Data" now and are too busy blogging about it on linkedin to bother with UML

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    With AGILE no one needs to draw complex diagrams that have special names for the parts.
    Oh I don't know, I once did an Agile project which included UML, pair programming, waterfall, scrums, AOA (any other acronym). I just ignored it all and was the only one on time...In fact the only project I've ever done with a PM, waste of time they are...

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    With AGILE no one needs to draw complex diagrams that have special names for the parts.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    started a topic Whatever happened to ....

    Whatever happened to ....

    ... UML?

    I remember when almost every job advert had "Must be proficient in UML".

    It was everywhere. Nothing could be done without stick men, activity diagrams, class diagrams, use cases written in nth detail.

    Then, one day, it just vanished....

Working...
X