Google and Cameron

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Paddy replied

22 July 2013, 09:31
If Cameron manages to ban Google searches for porn then the only results when searching for c**ts will be Cameron and Blair
Leave a comment:
TheFaQQer replied

22 July 2013, 08:57
Originally posted by stek View Post

Well of course clearing the cache doesn't actually delete it from disk, merely removes the pointer or inode, image or whatever is still there and recoverable...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

Which then means that you aren't possessing online pornography. Posessing pornography, yes, but not online pornography, unless you own the server that serves it up.
Leave a comment:
stek replied

22 July 2013, 08:55
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post

So the way round this legislation would be to clear your cache. That will have people quaking.

Well of course clearing the cache doesn't actually delete it from disk, merely removes the pointer or inode, image or whatever is still there and recoverable...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Leave a comment:
doodab replied

22 July 2013, 08:55
I think it's obvious that CMD hasn't a clue.

What happens when a victim googles one of the offending terms when looking for support services? A dawn raid care of SO19?
Leave a comment:
TheFaQQer replied

22 July 2013, 08:52
Originally posted by stek View Post

Cache....

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

So the way round this legislation would be to clear your cache. That will have people quaking.
Leave a comment:
stek replied

22 July 2013, 08:43
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post

Like this:

If it's online, how does one possess it?

Cache....

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Leave a comment:
TheFaQQer replied

22 July 2013, 08:41
Originally posted by mudskipper View Post

I thought this thread was about David Cameron not knowing how the internet works.

Like this:

Originally posted by BBC News

Mr Cameron will say possessing online pornography depicting rape

If it's online, how does one possess it?
Leave a comment:
mudskipper replied

22 July 2013, 05:23
I thought this thread was about David Cameron not knowing how the internet works.
Leave a comment:
NickFitz replied

21 July 2013, 23:57
Have you looked at the source of the image? It's a forum thread from three years ago about what you find if you do a Google image search for David Cameron side view
Leave a comment:
dmo replied

21 July 2013, 22:10
Lol. How very strange... did you find this by chance OP?
Leave a comment:
d000hg replied

21 July 2013, 21:58
These things change over time and even from one person to another, so to clarify - the one with the finger?
Leave a comment:
darmstadt started a topic Google and Cameron

21 July 2013, 21:35
Google and Cameron

Try 'david cameron side view' in Google images (the first is the best):
Tags: None