Originally posted by administrator
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Reader's Wives
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Reader's Wives"
Collapse
-
-
Mine we're too.Originally posted by vetran View Postmy score's were ten out of ten!
Leave a comment:
-
-
No.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostSo does that mean in my example with have wives for readers rather than a single reader? If so we are back to MrsMF
Try this.
http://firstschoolyears.com/literacy...e/possapos.swf
Leave a comment:
-
So does that mean in my example with have wives for readers rather than a single reader? If so we are back to MrsMFOriginally posted by mudskipper View PostIt is a digest for the reader. Not a digest for readers. (I am sad enough to have checked before I created the thread.)
Leave a comment:
-
It is a digest for the reader. Not a digest for readers. (I am sad enough to have checked before I created the thread.)Originally posted by SimonMac View PostYour/You're only saying that as you made the same mistake as I copied the wording you put up!
Leave a comment:
-
Well the attachment doesn't come cheap.Originally posted by vetran View PostNLYUK tells me that kind of extra costs £50.
Leave a comment:
-
Go easy on him - at least the apostrophe was required, even if it was misplaced. Normally we get a random sprinkling.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post[pedantry]
Is the reader in question a gentleman of Mohammedan persuasion given that the name of the publication suggests he has multiple wives?
[/pedantry]
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Today 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Yesterday 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16


Leave a comment: