• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Sally down a very dirty Alley without a paddle"

Collapse

  • bobspud
    replied


    just tried google voice search for Innocent Face and got a load of links back for Penis Size

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    Maybe I'm missing the intricacies of the libel system in this country, but I can't see how her tweet was libellous.

    I hope that there's no costs awarded and he gets £1, since he's always maintained that it was the principle that mattered.
    The statement made by the courts was..

    The judge said that in its natural and ordinary meaning, the tweet meant that Lord McAlpine was a paedophile who was guilty of sexually abusing boys living in care.

    He added that, if he was wrong about that, he would find that it bore an innuendo meaning to the same effect.
    which I must admit I can see if you put it that way.

    It should be a £1 and rogered silly until she walks like John Wayne for the next two days, in which case I will offer my services for Queen and Country ... if Paddy Doherty hasn't already.. on numerous occasions... or is that libellous?

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    As much as I would dearly love to bang the living daylights out of her am glad she has finally been held accountable for gobbing off all the time. Was going to happen at some point.
    Maybe I'm missing the intricacies of the libel system in this country, but I can't see how her tweet was libellous.

    I hope that there's no costs awarded and he gets £1, since he's always maintained that it was the principle that mattered.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    As much as I would dearly love to bang the living daylights out of her am glad she has finally been held accountable for gobbing off all the time. Was going to happen at some point.

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Just seen the paps on her! John's hands will be full

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Lockhouse View Post
    Why is Sally Bercow trending? *innocent face*

    Leave a comment:


  • Lockhouse
    replied
    Why is Sally Bercow trending? *innocent face*

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    started a topic Sally down a very dirty Alley without a paddle

    Sally down a very dirty Alley without a paddle

    Which is nice

    High Court rules Sally Bercow tweet was libellous - ITV News

Working...
X