• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Taxes - what taxes

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Taxes - what taxes"

Collapse

  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    No I'm saying the top 1% pay 25% of tax. They can decide not to pay we would be bankrupt in a week.

    The 80-90K are paying 20K in tax in real terms after costs (NHS,Education etc) , a millionaire earner is paying £450 in tax in real terms.

    so one >£1M earner = 25 * 80-90K earner.

    The million pound earner is more likely to spend on goods / services as well.

    £80K is enough to pay the mortgage and eat out a few times.

    Note they mention the top 10%, what they don't mention is :

    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/statistics/ta...iabilities.pdf

    the richest 1% of taxpayers by total income accounted for a 11.5% share of
    total income and 25.0% of tax liabilities.

    Table 2.5 also shows that there are
    small numbers of taxpayers with very high incomes, including an estimated
    10,000 with incomes above £1,000,000, among which 3,000 have income above
    £2,000,000. The distribution of taxpayers by total income therefore exhibits
    significant right skew.

    ----------


    These people have a lot of money and can afford to live abroad for > 180 days if need be.

    See Philip Green etc.

    or they will arrange to move the money out / spend in a way that reduces their tax liability.
    Put up corporation tax and they would benefit most from the corresponding reduction in personal taxes.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    No I'm saying the top 1% pay 25% of tax. They can decide not to pay we would be bankrupt in a week.
    No, it won't lead to bankrupcy - there is 0% chance they would stop being tax residents at the same and it would be very hard for them to do so given that residency rules are no longer "183 days in country".

    Those of them who had the chance to quit UK tax rates has already done so.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    And?!?!?!

    You are not saying everybody on £80-90k will just decide to move to another country to start afresh there?
    No I'm saying the top 1% pay 25% of tax. They can decide not to pay we would be bankrupt in a week.

    The 80-90K are paying 20K in tax in real terms after costs (NHS,Education etc) , a millionaire earner is paying £450 in tax in real terms.

    so one >£1M earner = 25 * 80-90K earner.

    The million pound earner is more likely to spend on goods / services as well.

    £80K is enough to pay the mortgage and eat out a few times.

    Note they mention the top 10%, what they don't mention is :

    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/statistics/ta...iabilities.pdf

    the richest 1% of taxpayers by total income accounted for a 11.5% share of
    total income and 25.0% of tax liabilities.

    Table 2.5 also shows that there are
    small numbers of taxpayers with very high incomes, including an estimated
    10,000 with incomes above £1,000,000, among which 3,000 have income above
    £2,000,000. The distribution of taxpayers by total income therefore exhibits
    significant right skew.

    ----------


    These people have a lot of money and can afford to live abroad for > 180 days if need be.

    See Philip Green etc.

    or they will arrange to move the money out / spend in a way that reduces their tax liability.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    The poorest 10% pay £4,000 in tax (mostly indirect, VAT, excise duty). But, receive over £5,000 in tax credits and benefits.
    The richest 10% pay over £30,000 in tax (mostly direct, income tax). They receive around £2,000 in benefits.
    Overall, the average household pays £12,000 in tax and receives £5,000 in benefits.
    And?!?!?!

    You are not saying everybody on £80-90k will just decide to move to another country to start afresh there?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    from your link:

    The poorest 10% pay £4,000 in tax (mostly indirect, VAT, excise duty). But, receive over £5,000 in tax credits and benefits.
    The richest 10% pay over £30,000 in tax (mostly direct, income tax). They receive around £2,000 in benefits.
    Overall, the average household pays £12,000 in tax and receives £5,000 in benefits.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    get rid of 50% of top payers and the rest of us (all levels) need to pay 30% more tax.
    Income tax is 30% of total budget revenues - NIC is also hidden income tax but I reckon majority of NIC is taken from people who can't avoid taxation (PAYE).

    Tax Revenue Sources in UK - Economics Blog

    Those rich who wanted to fook off has already done so, it's not unreasonable to expect that they pay same taxes as everybody else in this country.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Taxpayers have got 4 options:

    1) earn more to get more
    2) whine about it
    3) fook off somewhere else
    4) fook with HMRC and get fooked in return
    5) get onto benefits ladder

    I've chosen combination of #1 and #2.
    problem is most of the well off choose 3 or tax advice, however as much of the tax is paid by a small minority you don't want to encourage them to leave.

    get rid of 50% of top payers and the rest of us (all levels) need to pay 30% more tax.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Have you paid the final HP installment on that sofa yet?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Do I look like a person who needs financial advice?
    Have you paid the final HP installment on that sofa yet?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Just goes to show how much you know AtW. Commissions can no longer be charged on the back of financial advice. If you want financial advice you have to pay for it on a time and materials basis
    Do I look like a person who needs financial advice?

    Fixed cost to get legal opinion is actually ok.

    Charging ongoing %-tage of revenue that will have tax reduced due to complex scheme is a clear pointer that it is not a legal (or working) thing to do.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Asking for money in order to give tax advice of supposed legal way to reduce tax massively is a good sign it's most likely not legal (or "not working" as HMRC seems to put it).
    Just goes to show how much you know AtW. Commissions can no longer be charged on the back of financial advice. If you want financial advice you have to pay for it on a time and materials basis

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I'll tell you for £1000.
    I will tell you for £999

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I'll tell you for £1000.
    Asking for money in order to give tax advice of supposed legal way to reduce tax massively is a good sign it's most likely not legal (or "not working" as HMRC seems to put it).

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    I am not aware of a legal way to pay 3.5% income tax other than in cases when income is just over personal allowance.
    I'll tell you for £1000.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Like legally being able to pay 3.5% on your income, and legally being able to pay VAT in another EU nation?
    I am not aware of a legal way to pay 3.5% income tax other than in cases when income is just over personal allowance.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X