Originally posted by eek
View Post
Nor did she even claim to discover it. Her project was simply to measure the effect. She was helped in this by her father, a cardiac electrophysiologist, and twenty-six of his patients who volunteered to be experimented on so she could perform the measurements.
So kudos to her (and her dad) for making the point that people should read the safety warnings on stuff.
And no kudos at all to "journalists" at Bloomberg who totally misrepresented both her intention in doing the project and her conclusions by claiming that she had revealed "a flaw in the iPad" when, in fact, the important point is that everything is behaving as designed, and susceptible patients need to be aware that there are many things out there that could affect their implants in normal use.
But of course dressing it up as an iPad scare story generates a lot more advertising revenue for Bloomberg, and making that money for shareholders is a damn sight more important than providing accurate information to people about health issues.
Leave a comment: