• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: FAO Administrator

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "FAO Administrator"

Collapse

  • KentPhilip
    replied
    Originally posted by Zippy View Post
    Jesus, this bugger is boring. Is he new?
    Oh dear, you'll get a CUK fatwa against you for that..

    Leave a comment:


  • administrator
    replied
    Originally posted by Zippy View Post
    Jesus, this bugger is boring. Is he new?


    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    Long winded technical post with little meaning and less interested, where have we seen that before

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by Zippy View Post
    Jesus, this bugger is boring. Is he new?
    Long winded technical post with little meaning and less interested, where have we seen that before

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Zippy View Post
    Jesus, this bugger is boring. Is he new?

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    Originally posted by administrator View Post
    Cheers but was NAT's idea He sent me this a few days ago:
    xkcd • View topic - THE RECKONING cometh

    I knew I would be able to do it with user names but was not sure with the short common words due to how it panned out when I tried to censor some swear words. As well as the tulip that we still have I did lots of others too but when cockerel became noddyerel and scunthorpe became sdaffodilthorpe or something like that then I had to remove them all apart from the tulip one. Found an easy way of doing exact match replacement on small words as long as they weren't followed by punctuation so thought that would be enough. Had to expand my initial list of 50 words to over 120 for the posts to look messed up enough to be effective so was up late last night adding more!

    I only replaced something like 90 user names from the top posters by volume and who I had seen online over the past few days. Some of them didn't come online which was shame so will post them all here in a sec once I have cleaned up all the templates.

    So big thanks to NotAllThere for the idea! I was giggling like anything last night when putting them all up. Especially when fullyautomatix spotted what was going on, had to change his username to "justcallmeclaire" and "April Fools" to "I am pished", will undelete that thread in a sec too.
    Jesus, this bugger is boring. Is he new?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    I dunno. This IT technical stuff is just to much for my puny brain.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Unfortunately the straight swaps didn't work, so while Cojak became me, I didn't turn into her. Likewise Malcolm Buggeridge and gricerboy.
    Makes sense. If you have the strings:

    Code:
    aaa
    bbb
    ccc
    and you try to change aaa to ccc and ccc to aaa, you first change aaa:

    Code:
    ccc
    bbb
    ccc
    and then change ccc:

    Code:
    aaa
    bbb
    aaa
    so aaa just gets changed back again

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Unfortunately the straight swaps didn't work, so while Cojak became me, I didn't turn into her. Likewise Malcolm Buggeridge and gricerboy.

    Leave a comment:


  • ctdctd
    replied
    Originally posted by Zippy View Post
    Please tellme you've turned in to a reaponsible, tax-paying citizen?
    Or are you still shaggng yer mum. For a Findus pancake?
    But you're not bitter ?

    P.S. What's a "reaponsible" when it's at home?

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    Originally posted by ctdctd View Post
    Har Har

    Please tellme you've turned in to a reaponsible, tax-paying citizen?
    Or are you still shaggng yer mum. For a Findus pancake?

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Quite enjoyed being 'Gentile' for a while (again)

    Leave a comment:


  • ctdctd
    replied
    Originally posted by Zippy View Post
    WSS

    Edit: I quite liked being Bungle. Not as much as I'd have lliked being Andyw. Not bitter at all ....
    Har Har

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    Can we have a gold forum where we can stick all these threads and the other classics for posterity?
    WSS

    Edit: I quite liked being Bungle. Not as much as I'd have lliked being Andyw. Not bitter at all ....
    Last edited by Zippy; 1 April 2013, 18:03.

    Leave a comment:


  • oracleslave
    replied
    As an aside, crapdba is most appropriate as I have no technical ability at all

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Can we have a gold forum where we can stick all these threads and the other classics for posterity?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X