• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Habemus Papam!

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Habemus Papam!"

Collapse

  • GB9
    replied
    Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
    Dont be so daft. If Argentina took over the Isle of Man and dumped a boatload of Argies in there, they would all vote in favour of Argentina.
    Self-determination. We are actually pretty good about giving up territory when places no longer want us. This lot do.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by stek View Post
    The Falkland were British before Argentina even existed so we stole them legitimately...
    This, more or less.

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Habemus Papam!

    Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
    Exactly.
    And in the case of the red indians in native America? They would have voted to not have England and european countries invade (later to become the US and Canada states). But that didn't stop those invasions.

    So I see no reason (in principle) for the Falklands referendum vote to morally stop Argentina from taking over the Falklands.
    The Falkland were British before Argentina even existed so we stole them legitimately...

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
    Dont be so daft. If Argentina took over the Isle of Man and dumped a boatload of Argies in there, they would all vote in favour of Argentina.
    Exactly.
    And in the case of the red indians in native America? They would have voted to not have England and european countries invade (later to become the US and Canada states). But that didn't stop those invasions.

    So I see no reason (in principle) for the Falklands referendum vote to morally stop Argentina from taking over the Falklands.

    Leave a comment:


  • fullyautomatix
    replied
    Originally posted by GB9 View Post
    The Islanders themselves want to remain British, well, all but 3. And that's the most important bit.

    Dont be so daft. If Argentina took over the Isle of Man and dumped a boatload of Argies in there, they would all vote in favour of Argentina.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    Not according to the Argies.
    Originally posted by Bunk View Post
    Or that **** Morrissey
    What difference does it make?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bunk
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    Not according to the Argies.
    Or that **** Morrissey

    Leave a comment:


  • GB9
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    Not according to the Argies.
    True, but according to the United Nations who should theoretically trump them.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by GB9 View Post
    The Islanders themselves want to remain British, well, all but 3. And that's the most important bit.
    Not according to the Argies.

    Leave a comment:


  • GB9
    replied
    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    Because he's a senior public figure.

    Comparing him to Hitler is daft.

    English people in senior public roles do think they should remain British.
    The Islanders themselves want to remain British, well, all but 3. And that's the most important bit.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    I bet they don't. Being a senior figure does NOT mean you automatically toe a party line, even though most do.

    Leave a comment:


  • cailin maith
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Why? Because you're from a place you have to defend its view? Germans don't think Hitler was a good bloke just because they're German. English people don't automatically think the Falklands should remain British.
    Because he's a senior public figure.

    Comparing him to Hitler is daft.

    English people in senior public roles do think they should remain British.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    I see he's a Jesuit. Pope Torquemada 1 would be a brill name.

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Why? Because you're from a place you have to defend its view? Germans don't think Hitler was a good bloke just because they're German. English people don't automatically think the Falklands should remain British.
    Yeah, but the Austrians thought he was cool as f**k

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    Erm, he is actually Argentinian - of course he will think the Falklands belong to them. Be a bit of a tulip Argentinian, if he didn't
    Why? Because you're from a place you have to defend its view? Germans don't think Hitler was a good bloke just because they're German. English people don't automatically think the Falklands should remain British.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X