• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Shortage of social housing???"

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    At the moment I'm married so it's not an issue. I hope.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I can't think I'd care, since I'd be dead, and I don't have family/friends who would wonder where Id got to.
    ftfy

    Leave a comment:


  • amoeba
    replied
    Originally posted by wikramasingha View Post
    I wad told the following by a work colleague but I do not know if it is accurate. Perhaps somebody could cooperate this.

    Any new housing development must have a certain percentage given over to social housing. This may be as high as 20%.

    What this means is that any new housing development will have undesirables among its populace and so you wouldn't want to live in a new development.
    In my home town (Andover, Hampshire) the last few large estates have had 40% social housing. Then apparently the Army bought 10% of the housing, so assuming they fill them with squaddies rather than officers we have 50% undesirables.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Nope the postie wouldn't going by the empty places I see with mail piling up.

    The best thing to do is get on with your neighbours and tell them when you aren't around.

    I did read a story of a young bloke who use to do that but was ill for a week then went to stay with his dad and so when his neighbours didn't see him for 8 days they got the police to break in.
    I can't think I'd care, since I'd be dead, if I didn't have family/friends who would wonder where Id got to.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    I know a chap who works for the council and he has the unenviable job sometimes of cleaning up such places.

    There's apparently something about the smell. Even after years of doing it he invariably has to dash outside and puke.
    The stench from my brother's building was unbearable, I was a butcher and had to do the bone bin job once a week, but the dead body smell was off the chart.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Poor cleaners. That must have reeked.
    I know a chap who works for the council and he has the unenviable job sometimes of cleaning up such places.

    There's apparently something about the smell. Even after years of doing it he invariably has to dash outside and puke.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    If you had lots of dosh in the bank, and paid rent, gas, electric, council tax, TV licence on standing order, there's no reason why anyone should ever trouble you.

    One would hope the postie would notice piled up mail.
    Nope the postie wouldn't going by the empty places I see with mail piling up.

    The best thing to do is get on with your neighbours and tell them when you aren't around.

    I did read a story of a young bloke who use to do that but was ill for a week then went to stay with his dad and so when his neighbours didn't see him for 8 days they got the police to break in.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Note to self: Must get some friends so at least somebody will find my body.

    Though I think my landlords would notice if I didn't pay the rent for 2 years.
    If you had lots of dosh in the bank, and paid rent, gas, electric, council tax, TV licence on standing order, there's no reason why anyone should ever trouble you.

    One would hope the postie would notice piled up mail.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Guy in my brother's building died and was not found for 3 months, when the person below complained about a damp patch in the roof above the police eventually broke in.

    Leave a comment:


  • formant
    replied
    Ew.


    I'd say 'poor guy', but it's not like he would have noticed that his death went unnoticed for that long...

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Another one:

    BBC NEWS | England | London | Woman's body in bedsit for years

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by wikramasingha View Post
    I wad told the following by a work colleague but I do not know if it is accurate. Perhaps somebody could cooperate this.

    Any new housing development must have a certain percentage given over to social housing. This may be as high as 20%.

    What this means is that any new housing development will have undesirables among its populace and so you wouldn't want to live in a new development.
    The trick is to find a development that is too small to have to follow local council diktats regarding "social housing" and "affordability"

    I found one such for my second house which was built on the site of an old nursing home and comprised of only 12 4 bed detached houses

    hope this 'cooperate' this enuff

    Leave a comment:


  • The Spartan
    replied
    Originally posted by wikramasingha View Post
    I wad told the following by a work colleague but I do not know if it is accurate. Perhaps somebody could cooperate this.

    Any new housing development must have a certain percentage given over to social housing. This may be as high as 20%.

    What this means is that any new housing development will have undesirables among its populace and so you wouldn't want to live in a new development.
    You are indeed correct but it only applies to developments of a certain size, not sure how many houses are the minimum before this is applied though.

    Leave a comment:


  • wikramasingha
    replied
    I wad told the following by a work colleague but I do not know if it is accurate. Perhaps somebody could cooperate this.

    Any new housing development must have a certain percentage given over to social housing. This may be as high as 20%.

    What this means is that any new housing development will have undesirables among its populace and so you wouldn't want to live in a new development.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Note to self: Must get some friends so at least somebody will find my body.

    Though I think my landlords would notice if I didn't pay the rent for 2 years.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X