Reply to: For the avoidance of doubt - Mod

[mudskipper]

It may amaze you to discover that we don't read every post in every thread.

We often rely on people using the reporting button to point things out. And no-one, not even you, could be arsed to report that post.

We ain't no grasses!

[SimonMac]

Of course it's Ok on CUK to post highly objectionable and offensive posts like this one :

http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...-africa-9.html

Its not offensive until someone reports it to the Daily Mail and then everyone is outraged on someone else's behalf

[cojak]

Of course it's Ok on CUK to post highly objectionable and offensive posts like this one :

http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...-africa-9.html

It may amaze you to discover that we don't read every post in every thread.

We often rely on people using the reporting button to point things out. And no-one, not even you, could be arsed to report that post.

[mudskipper]

You can run but you can never hide.

As long as you're not wearing high heels and a mini skirt.

[SimonMac]

It depends if they can track you down IRL or not.

[NotAllThere]

It depends if they can track you down IRL or not.

[SimonMac]

If a member is banned are they still off limits for the intent to irritate or inflame?

#JustSaying

[BrilloPad]

I thought they just made up decisions on the fly, what ate these rules you speak off and where can I find them

1. mods toss a coin. heads they win, tails you lose
2. the mods decision is final. any disagreement and you get a ban with a return of your membership fee

[mudskipper]

what ate these rules

That'd be zeity.

[SimonMac]

You're OK SMac - this isn't HMRC. They don't make up new rules then apply them retrospectively.

I thought they just made up decisions on the fly, what ate these rules you speak off and where can I find them

[mudskipper]

You're OK SMac - this isn't HMRC. They don't make up new rules then apply them retrospectively.

[SimonMac]

So how come when people had avatars of Gentile around the time of her banning, why were they not banned

Ah, of course, she wasn't real

*keeps quiet*

[BrilloPad]

"with the intent to irritate or inflame" - of course all the mods are clairvoyant so can tell. thank godness its not just a case of randomness.

[AtW]

Where were people doing this, it sounds like a fun thread.

Are you blind George?

[mos]

Where were people doing this, it sounds like a fun thread.

( )