• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "UK will not extend Romania and Bulgaria migration curbs"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    A minister? Don't you mean Lembit Opek? He'll never be a minister.
    well apparently he was ministering to her needs sufficiently

    - Ih thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    they didn't have any trouble before they just shagged a minister.
    A minister? Don't you mean Lembit Opek? He'll never be a minister.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    That may be partly true but if so we need to fix it, mass immigration solves nothing. If there's a fundamental problem then how long before the new comers are just as lazy? What do you do then, bring in more immigrants?

    My point was that those disproportionately without jobs, with the lowest academic acheivement, and who were disproportionately involved in the riots in London are not the white British. I really suggest people should check actual facts before they keep parroting this lazy Brits at the bottom the heap myth. The least successful are immigrants and the descendants of immigrants. Look at government GCSE acheivement by ethnicity for example, Chinese, Indian, White British, European, Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Black in that order. Take in more Eastern Europeans and the employment chances you are going to be wrecking most are those of existing ethnic minorities and that will only lead to more disorder.

    Another reality, regardless of the PC nonsense, is the fact that the main driver of immigration is immigration. Get any significant number from any area, however useful, and you it will not be long before the other sort follow them in. Both these countries have very significant problems with organised crime. They also have porous borders with others, like Albania, who are even worse.
    WXs +1

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Good.

    Finally cheeky girls won't have problems in passport control -

    they didn't have any trouble before they just shagged a minister.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Hack
    replied
    Great news, the price of hookers will come down.

    MF

    Leave a comment:


  • The Spartan
    replied
    What a shambles, if only people would protest more then something might get done. On the other hand I doubt it

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Good.

    Finally cheeky girls won't have problems in passport control -

    Are you sure they're girls?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Who asked you?
    It's a public forum dude, don't post anything if you don't expect to get comments.

    What is your evidence that somehow Bulgaria and Romania are working against EU policy in regards to Middle East?

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Last year's riots were caused by the welfare state
    That may be partly true but if so we need to fix it, mass immigration solves nothing. If there's a fundamental problem then how long before the new comers are just as lazy? What do you do then, bring in more immigrants?

    My point was that those disproportionately without jobs, with the lowest academic acheivement, and who were disproportionately involved in the riots in London are not the white British. I really suggest people should check actual facts before they keep parroting this lazy Brits at the bottom the heap myth. The least successful are immigrants and the descendants of immigrants. Look at government GCSE acheivement by ethnicity for example, Chinese, Indian, White British, European, Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Black in that order. Take in more Eastern Europeans and the employment chances you are going to be wrecking most are those of existing ethnic minorities and that will only lead to more disorder.

    Another reality, regardless of the PC nonsense, is the fact that the main driver of immigration is immigration. Get any significant number from any area, however useful, and you it will not be long before the other sort follow them in. Both these countries have very significant problems with organised crime. They also have porous borders with others, like Albania, who are even worse.
    Last edited by xoggoth; 11 November 2012, 22:30.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bacchus
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    But who will they disproportionately be forcing out of jobs in the London area? Last year's riots will be nothing compared to the next one.
    No-one I suspect.

    Brits don't want to work in Starbucks for minimum wage.

    Last year's riots were caused by the welfare state. A generation that has grown up with an expectation, they have never really had to work for anything, can't see why they shouldn't have the latest iBox so seize the opportunity to walk into a shop and take it. Thieving tow-rags

    Leave a comment:


  • Bacchus
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    What's wrong is not mafia, and it's not benefits, although they might be significant issues. It's numbers.

    population of Romania c 21.8 million
    population of Bulgaria c 7 million
    population of Inida c 1.25 BILLION

    I think you might be right...

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Who asked you?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    The reason for picking on Romania and Bulgaria is because those countries are not blindly following UK and EU foreign policy particular in relation to the Middle East.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    If the government was serious they would stop immigration from India. The reason for picking on Romania and Bulgaria is because those countries are not blindly following UK and EU foreign policy particular in relation to the Middle East.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    What's wrong is not mafia, and it's not benefits, although they might be significant issues. It's numbers.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X