• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Unemployment down again"

Collapse

  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Employment/Unemployment is all a bit simplistic really isn't it?

    If 100,000 professional workers on an average of £50K all lose their jobs and find work stacking shelves and flipping burgers part time on min wage we are supposed to be grateful and excited?
    Not excited, no.

    Two things. First, where did you get the figure of 100,000 former £50K earners who now cannot get work above the minimum wage? Since when has this happened?

    Secondly I've done similar in the past, and to me actually having work is preferable to having none at all. Psychologically if nothing else.

    Leave a comment:


  • escapeUK
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    If 100,000 professional workers on an average of £50K all lose their jobs and find work stacking shelves and flipping burgers part time on min wage we are supposed to be grateful and excited?
    If they were public sector workers then I would be.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Just read a good headline on that BBC page

    Barrister heads Savile NHS probe

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    But the worst is yet to come BBC News - BoE's Tucker: Worst may still be ahead for banking

    By kicking the can down the line since 2008 Paul Tucker and his friends at the BoE have ensured that when the fallout comes its going to be that bit worse.

    As ever the poor will bear the brunt of it though.

    I feel for SASguru

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    But the worst is yet to come BBC News - BoE's Tucker: Worst may still be ahead for banking

    By kicking the can down the line since 2008 Paul Tucker and his friends at the BoE have ensured that when the fallout comes its going to be that bit worse.

    As ever the poor will bear the brunt of it though.

    Leave a comment:


  • doomage
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Yes. And would you like fries with that?

    I'd love some fries with that, unfortunately I'm too busy stacking shelves.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by doomage View Post
    I dunno, are you?
    Yes. And would you like fries with that?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
    Temporary employment for the olympic games , or some fudging of figures to remove some subset of people (students perhaps?) I reckon.

    From what I'm seeing , opportunities for work are still diminishing

    Great news if it's true though
    truth is lefties are incapable of creating any "real" jobs

    Leave a comment:


  • doomage
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Employment/Unemployment is all a bit simplistic really isn't it?

    If 100,000 professional workers on an average of £50K all lose their jobs and find work stacking shelves and flipping burgers part time on min wage we are supposed to be grateful and excited?
    I dunno, are you?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Employment/Unemployment is all a bit simplistic really isn't it?

    If 100,000 professional workers on an average of £50K all lose their jobs and find work stacking shelves and flipping burgers part time on min wage we are supposed to be grateful and excited?

    It works for SASGuru

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Employment/Unemployment is all a bit simplistic really isn't it?

    If 100,000 professional workers on an average of £50K all lose their jobs and find work stacking shelves and flipping burgers part time on min wage we are supposed to be grateful and excited?

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    We're talking about a govermint statistic.

    What's "truth" got to do with that?
    Well your lot are in charge aren't they?

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Jobs won't be required in the People's Republic of Scotland. Everyone will live off benefits thanks to oil money.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scoobos
    replied
    Temporary employment for the olympic games , or some fudging of figures to remove some subset of people (students perhaps?) I reckon.

    From what I'm seeing , opportunities for work are still diminishing

    Great news if it's true though

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    started a topic Unemployment down again

    Unemployment down again

    UK unemployment down again.

    Except in Scotland.

Working...
X