• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Abu Hamza again

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Abu Hamza again"

Collapse

  • BA to the Stars
    replied
    Will he have to take his hook off to go through the scanners at the airport

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Hack
    replied
    Originally posted by The Spartan View Post
    Apparently they're using the old "As the website was hosting on US soil it comes under our jurisdiction as a crime was committed in our country" excuse
    Ah, I wasn't aware of that. Was he aware it was being hosted there (quickly goes and checks where his kill a politician fund raising site is based)?

    Leave a comment:


  • BA to the Stars
    replied
    Originally posted by The Spartan View Post
    I wonder how much all this legal wrangling has cost, seeing as the guy who is representing him is a QC
    Choo Choo, all aboard the legal gravy train

    Leave a comment:


  • The Spartan
    replied
    I wonder how much all this legal wrangling has cost, seeing as the guy who is representing him is a QC

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Sounds like the Judge is based on this planet!

    But the judge said he could be treated in the US and added "the sooner he stands trial the better".
    BBC News - Abu Hamza judge questions appeal

    Leave a comment:


  • The Spartan
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Hack View Post
    I'd much prefer we sent him back from whence he came, for he'd not get solitary in a cell with Al-Jazeera on night and day.

    One of the other chaps has to be tried here, imo, as he committed his crimes here. It's starting to be a bit thin edge of the wedge that we're sending them all to America, just because America wants them. I am slowly starting to think there's some things not quite right with our judicial process if the web site chappie gets extradited.
    Apparently they're using the old "As the website was hosting on US soil it comes under our jurisdiction as a crime was committed in our country" excuse

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    It's a good job the internet has lots of pictures of naked ladies to take our minds off it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Btw that sickening judge moaning about the delays is twunt (like most lawyers) they run their own closed shop then whine about it - twunts

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Can't we let him out and get that copper who coshed the newspaper seller to be his close protection ?

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
    So why can't we send him to USA even if his health has deteriorated.....?
    Originally posted by BoredBloke View Post
    Exactly, they have hospitals over there. fook him.
    Better a civilised law which can be twisted than a lack of protection for those who are at risk. I suppose... like how in medical testing, a false positive is bad but far better than a false negative.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Hack
    replied
    I'd much prefer we sent him back from whence he came, for he'd not get solitary in a cell with Al-Jazeera on night and day.

    One of the other chaps has to be tried here, imo, as he committed his crimes here. It's starting to be a bit thin edge of the wedge that we're sending them all to America, just because America wants them. I am slowly starting to think there's some things not quite right with our judicial process if the web site chappie gets extradited.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Why not strap his good hand to his head, then put a tin of itching powder in his undies

    see what his 76 virgins think THAT.




    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Can't we just put him out his misery?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Surely he could be remanded in custody, just coincidentally sharing a cell with someone from the BNP?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    pity Jack isn't still in charge, he would let him go back so he can die at home, pity that terrorist is still going strong 10 years later.

    Just send him to the first world ally with world leading medical facilities and get shot of him.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X