Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Should three parent babies be allowed?"
Have you ever wondered why bulls are all one colour (usually black) whilst the cows have that typical cow pattern ?
Have you ever wondered why women are more prone to things like arthritis, esp when pregnant
Exactly. Project Guru was scrapped at an early stage. Some say the science was flawed. Others that they chose the wrong DNA> Still others suspect that a fourth individual's DNA was slipped into the code but the Men in Black torched the facility to be on the safe side. ...
Partly right, but someone should set the record straight about Project SAS (Super Army Soldier).
This was some top-secret genetics work done at Porton Down in the '80s to breed a soldier of sub-human intelligence but enormous strength and ensurance. Unfortunately, despite an encouraging start, it went terribly wrong.
The idea had been to create a hulking cyborg titan, who would start attacking all and sundry with a gatling gun under each arm, on receipt of the code word "cretin". But the result was a 5'11'' 12 stone weakling who could barely lift a .22 rifle.
The units were recycled, but there were rumours at the time that one managed to escape. This seems unlikely, but we won't know for sure until the papers are released in 2100.
And an early indication that we should steer well clear of the whole notion.
Exactly. Project Guru was scrapped at an early stage. Some say the science was flawed. Others that they chose the wrong DNA> Still others suspect that a fourth individual's DNA was slipped into the code but the Men in Black torched the facility to be on the safe side.
On the other, imagine if scientists could identify the sasguru gene and eliminate that from society - how wonderful would that be?
In the scenario described the third party would just be supplying a couple of DNA patches, which hardly seems to warrant being called a parent (and no doubt in due course these will be capable of being generated artificially).
Where it would get iffy is if two parents contribute the nucleus DNA and a third parent provides a complete set of mitochondrial DNA, which does contribute substantially to someone's unique identity.
That's nothing to do with the ethics of this discussion.
The three parent babies will have a proper mum and dad. The third parent is being used to ensure invalid DNA is removed to ensure genetic defects aren't inherited.
Hence there are ethical issues but they have nothing to do with same sex couples, surrogacy or sperm donors. Although we really have to congratulate the Mail journalist for getting virtually every Daily Mail pet subject in a single story. They do however seem to miss the house prices of the participants so its not perfect.
Only if the DNA donor re going to be the ones bringing the kid up. A 3-bio-parent baby brought up by an interracial illegal immigrant disabled gay couple on benefits, that's a good one.
Leave a comment: