- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Don't you just love it when ...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Don't you just love it when ..."
Collapse
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostWell you know what they say......"You are what you eat!"
HTH

Leave a comment:
-
SY, Sas is too busy amazing the salesman with his driving to reply right now.
Leave a comment:
-
Care to back that up? I was the one in the right, and could prove it as I keep minutes of meetings.Originally posted by sasguru View PostFFS you really are the saddest mediocre fookwit who ever failed to grace the IT profession.
I used to eat incompetent gimps like you for breakfast.
Leave a comment:
-
I think it was a simple database update that went in without approval that ****ed Natwest.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostWhat would they test?
Lets say you have 1000 accounts in a salesforce system and you want to change the rep from A to B.
Lets say you build the Account List Primary Key, The Rep Key Before, The Rep Key after.
Lets say you run it through the reporting instance to check
Lets say that as the BI Manager you confirm it's correct.
Lets say you then ask the Administrator to do it ( a simple data change).
Why would you then test it in Dev, then test it in Test where the data doesnt exist, so it's uncheckable, then ask the business to sign it off in dev, then ask the business to sign it off in test, before agreeing a go and no go & getting someone to run it in Production.
IT people get really confused between simple data updates & development change control processes. It's the equivalent of doing an update sql statement. You build the select from to check it, you run it once against a copy of the data, you take a copy of the rows you're planning to change(just in case), then check it worked. You don't have 200 million ******* people checking it, doing 'stories', writing BRDS, discussing it for weeks, test plans etc. It's Business Intelligence not ******* some major ******* deployment for NASA.
IT Developers don't have a ******* clue about data let alone some bint in a back office.
Leave a comment:
-
What a surprise. My account has been suspended again. 8th time in 4 weeks. Every Wednesday, Every Friday at near the same time & the fookers cannot work out what piece of integration on their tulipty side is doing it. I'm off to the pub and I'm charging.Originally posted by original PM View PostI feel you pain dude!
Some people seem to think db's exist to give them something to obsess over not to provide a service to the damn business
Leave a comment:
-
You're the old boy on "million dollar trader" aren't you?Originally posted by sasguru View PostNo, you don't have to hang around.
Just pop in and some cretinous gimp will pop up over the parapet in no time.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm contracted as BI/Reporting Manager. I'm tasked with cleaning their entire database, restructuring it, implementing a master data strategy, designing a datawarehouse, implementing it, training them. First thing I did when I walked in was noticed that they had no primary keys visible to anyone in the business (ie. No Account Key, No Opportunity key) they were doing everything in spreadsheets and if two accounts had the same name, or two opportunities they manually changed it in a spreadsheet. The ****wit who threw her toys out was responsible for that.Originally posted by Pondlife View PostMy reason for going
is that I'm a contractor. It's their (the business') data and therefore they should sign off that it's correct, not someone who is an external supplier.
It's my data now.
Leave a comment:
-
My reason for going
is that I'm a contractor. It's their (the business') data and therefore they should sign off that it's correct, not someone who is an external supplier.
Leave a comment:
-
I feel you pain dude!Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostWhat would they test?
Lets say you have 1000 accounts in a salesforce system and you want to change the rep from A to B.
SNip etc etc etc
Half don't even know what it is. If a database went down every time someone looked at the ******* thing nothing would work.
Some people seem to think db's exist to give them something to obsess over not to provide a service to the damn business
Leave a comment:
-
And while I'm
Do you know the other thing I ******* hate. Every contract I go to, some Administrator or some DBA gets all uppity the second you want a database connection so you can return run some simple reports using a BI tool, or christ you may want to start building a datawarehouse. The number of twats who think that connecting via an ODBC connection will lock the database and take the application down if you run a query truely beggars belief. Half don't even know what it is. If a database went down every time someone looked at the ******* thing nothing would work.
Leave a comment:
-
What would they test?Originally posted by bless 'em all View PostNo, I did that as well.
What happened to running this past the testers MF?
Lets say you have 1000 accounts in a salesforce system and you want to change the rep from A to B.
Lets say you build the Account List Primary Key, The Rep Key Before, The Rep Key after.
Lets say you run it through the reporting instance to check
Lets say that as the BI Manager you confirm it's correct.
Lets say you then ask the Administrator to do it ( a simple data change).
Why would you then test it in Dev, then test it in Test where the data doesnt exist, so it's uncheckable, then ask the business to sign it off in dev, then ask the business to sign it off in test, before agreeing a go and no go & getting someone to run it in Production.
IT people get really confused between simple data updates & development change control processes. It's the equivalent of doing an update sql statement. You build the select from to check it, you run it once against a copy of the data, you take a copy of the rows you're planning to change(just in case), then check it worked. You don't have 200 million ******* people checking it, doing 'stories', writing BRDS, discussing it for weeks, test plans etc. It's Business Intelligence not ******* some major ******* deployment for NASA.
IT Developers don't have a ******* clue about data let alone some bint in a back office.
Leave a comment:
-
No, I did that as well.Originally posted by Pondlife View PostIs it just me that read this and went
What happened to running this past the testers MF?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Today 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Yesterday 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45

Leave a comment: