• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "How is this proportional and fair?"

Collapse

  • speling bee
    replied
    Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
    d000hg these guys wont even know that Muslim's faught alongside us, I assume , perhaps wrongly, that it is aimed at the white western population.

    My motivation is driven by my ex military background not racial predujice.

    I seriously can't understand how this is tolerated; and how people don't see just how hateful and hurtful it is.

    4 months compared to 50 quid is just not acceptable for me, and any disrespect to dead soilders needs to be stamped down on much harder than this.

    I just think it sends totally the wrong message and fuels the racists.

    It is hateful and hurtful and people shouldn't do it.

    But would it be acceptable if the dead soldiers were war criminals? Various Japanese nationalists get in trouble for honouring sites which include mention of category 1 war criminals.

    The difficulty is that different people will have different views of what is a war crime. Some people will think that all war is crime and all soldiers are murderers. Others will think that different soldiers are war criminals in different circumstances. Is it that you wish to legislate against? Or do you wish to legislate against people protesting in this way, whether or not they believe that soldiers are war criminals? In which case would you like to see similar penalties against protestors who burn swastikas at a fascist commemoration of SS soldiers?

    I'm afraid it is hard to legislate against all unpleasantness. I am legally allowed to ignore my neighbour when he says hello, sleep with your wife, laugh at a puppy that has been run over and that is dying in the street.

    Some people are just mean, I'm afraid.

    Leave a comment:


  • speling bee
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Thats ******* brillant!! Made me laugh out loud in a dead office
    It's only dead because Clare crashed a plane into it.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    Hang on, I have just noted the InTouch Logo.....

    Thats ******* brillant!! Made me laugh out loud in a dead office

    Leave a comment:


  • speling bee
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Umm, I suggested the muslim extremists stick one finger in the air; where did I say that anyone sticking their finger in the air is a muslim extremist?

    Oh sorry, forgot it's CUK general. Anyway, he's sticking his thumb in the air too.
    So he could be a Muslim extremist?

    An interesting historical perspective is that Rod Hull was a Muslim extremist and Emu was his cover for having a finger in the air.
    Last edited by speling bee; 30 August 2012, 15:21.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
    d000hg these guys wont even know that Muslim's faught alongside us, I assume , perhaps wrongly, that it is aimed at the white western population.

    My motivation is driven by my ex military background not racial predujice.

    I seriously can't understand how this is tolerated; and how people don't see just how hateful and hurtful it is.

    4 months compared to 50 quid is just not acceptable for me, and any disrespect to dead soilders needs to be stamped down on much harder than this.

    I just think it sends totally the wrong message and fuels the racists.
    This reply is flawed on quite a few levels which is why you won't understand that it is about point of law, not hot headed anger.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Umm, I suggested the muslim extremists stick one finger in the air; where did I say that anyone sticking their finger in the air is a muslim extremist?

    Oh sorry, forgot it's CUK general.
    Hang on, I have just noted the InTouch Logo.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post


    Umm, I suggested the muslim extremists stick one finger in the air; where did I say that anyone sticking their finger in the air is a muslim extremist?

    Oh sorry, forgot it's CUK general. Anyway, he's sticking his thumb in the air too.

    Leave a comment:


  • speling bee
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    I suppose we could compare sentences received for "Pissing on the cenotaph" and "Burning Poppies"...

    Just saying, like...
    Interesting article about Charlie Gilmour's 18 month sentence and comparisons to Pussy Riot.

    The west's hypocrisy over Pussy Riot is breathtaking | Simon Jenkins | Comment is free | The Guardian

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
    One race shouting for another race to "burn in hell" and setting fire to a symbol of the Allied sacrifice to combat race hate and totalitarianism is racial hatred in my book.
    The Allies aren't one race. in WW1/2 it was (broadly) the same race on both sides. Neither WW1 or WW2 were [primarily] about 'combating race hate'.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Anyway, why do extremist muslims always seem to have one finger pointing in the air?

    Should someone inform customs and immigration? 'Nothing wrong with muslims, chaps, it's just the ones who point their finger into the sky; they can be a bit awkward'.


    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    I suppose we could compare sentences received for "Pissing on the cenotaph" and "Burning Poppies"...

    Just saying, like...
    People who do that kind of thing have recieved the ultimate sentence already; their own sad, miserable, failed existence. Fine them if it's really necessary, but most of all ridicule them, point fingers at them and laugh in their faces.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Why is burning poppies racist? It could be deemed xenophobic at best.
    Its a racist attack, if the victim perceives it as such. apparently

    Leave a comment:


  • Scoobos
    replied
    d000hg these guys wont even know that Muslim's faught alongside us, I assume , perhaps wrongly, that it is aimed at the white western population.

    My motivation is driven by my ex military background not racial predujice.

    I seriously can't understand how this is tolerated; and how people don't see just how hateful and hurtful it is.

    4 months compared to 50 quid is just not acceptable for me, and any disrespect to dead soilders needs to be stamped down on much harder than this.

    I just think it sends totally the wrong message and fuels the racists.
    Last edited by Scoobos; 30 August 2012, 15:12.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
    Hmm, I agree with the sentiment NLUK but I don't see how burning poppies isn't criminal damage and inciting racial hatred either. But now I'm repeating myself like a true raving maniac.
    Why is burning poppies racist? It could be deemed xenophobic at best.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
    One race shouting for another race to "burn in hell" and setting fire to a symbol of the Allied sacrifice to combat race hate and totalitarianism is racial hatred in my book.
    Thank god we have a strict legal system to fall back on rather than this happy clapping bollox.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X