• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Bloke gets hacked big style.Google, Twitter, Aoole ID, iPhone, iPad, MacBook wiped"

Collapse

  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View Post
    Yeah.

    Remote wipe plus no backup ever? I may be lazy sometimes but I could never be that lax.
    Exactly. It's not as if it's hard to back up a Mac: plug in a USB drive (or get an Airport Extreme and plug a drive into that) and the OS will ask if you want to use it for Time Machine backups. Say yes and hey presto, you have regular backups happening silently in the background.

    The other day I managed to screw up my Eclipse setup at ClientCo. I just logged into my network at home, opened up the Time Machine backup of the Applications directory and restored a working Eclipse from there

    In fact, thinking about it, the only time I ever use the backup is restoring Eclipse to a previous working copy when a new plugin has destroyed things. I should stop using Eclipse

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    The consensus of opinion seems to be that you should only set it up for a laptop when taking it somewhere it might be nicked, like when on holiday.
    Unless of course you are a Civil Servant or work for the MoD and are prone to leaving the things in pubs, on buses or in taxis

    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    Yeah.

    Remote wipe plus no backup ever? I may be lazy sometimes but I could never be that lax.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Apple only allowed them to remotely own all his apple devices.
    Only because he'd set them up that way.

    There's a good argument for setting a phone up for remote wipe, less so for a laptop.

    The consensus of opinion seems to be that you should only set it up for a laptop when taking it somewhere it might be nicked, like when on holiday.

    The moral in this story is that you don't want to set up remote wipe for all your stuff, at least not where it can be done from one account.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Secure your digital self: auditing your cloud identity

    Ars Technica: Secure your digital self: auditing your cloud identity

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Yes, you'd expect better than that from Amazon and Apple.



    Ah, just Apple getting the blame is it? Despite the fact that it was only Amazon's ludicrously insecure procedures that allowed them to hack Apple's system as the second step in the process?
    good point they managed to get into Amazon's system as well, add a credit card and view the last 4 digits of another card a bit like every person who looks at a credit card receipt.

    Now if they had been able to order a £100k of porn and deliver to another address then Amazon might have been in a worse state. But they didn't.

    Apple only allowed them to remotely own all his apple devices.

    Leave a comment:


  • norrahe
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    Dunno what online banking he's using but I need a lot more than e.mail to get at mine.
    Cooperative bank used to have really crap security for their business banking, e-mail address/account number and password.

    Not sure if they have improved it.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    ably assisted by a wide open security model supplied by the fanbois favourite vendor.
    Yes, you'd expect better than that from Amazon and Apple.

    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    you would have thought that Apple would have run their security systems by a few experts before allowing remote wipe and chaining.
    Ah, just Apple getting the blame is it? Despite the fact that it was only Amazon's ludicrously insecure procedures that allowed them to hack Apple's system as the second step in the process?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by scottr View Post
    Melodramatic muppet. He's lucky they didn't do a great deal more damage.
    They could have used my e-mail accounts to gain access to my online banking, or financial service
    Dunno what online banking he's using but I need a lot more than e.mail to get at mine.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    In short, the very four digits (of a credit card number) that Amazon considers unimportant enough to display in the clear on the web are precisely the same ones that Apple considers secure enough to perform identity verification.
    I do think that shows how ad hoc and poorly planned many security procedures are.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    ably assisted by a wide open security model supplied by the fanbois favourite vendor.


    you would have thought that Apple would have run their security systems by a few experts before allowing remote wipe and chaining.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by scottr View Post
    Melodramatic muppet. He's lucky they didn't do a great deal more damage.
    whs++;

    He's a journalist, he's hyped up a situation that he brought upon himself.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mose
    replied
    Melodramatic muppet. He's lucky they didn't do a great deal more damage.

    Leave a comment:


  • farout117
    replied
    Originally posted by FiveTimes View Post
    true - I'm changing all my passwords from "passw0rd" to "pa55w0rd", that should do it
    cracking idea

    Leave a comment:


  • FiveTimes
    replied
    Originally posted by farout117 View Post
    True or not, this article really makes you think how vulnerable we can be online, if you do not take the necessary precautions
    true - I'm changing all my passwords from "passw0rd" to "pa55w0rd", that should do it

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X