• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "HSBC Money Laundering Scandal"

Collapse

  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    What else is new and surprising?

    The execs of the top companies have been fleecing the shareholders for decades now. Nothing new here.

    I suppose one can consol themselves that at least HSBC was dealing in cash and not made up investments called derivatives.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Time to refresh the tree of liberty. SOX is a damp squib until they start locking people up.

    I imagine the CIA etc knew about this and preferred the drug dealers were in the tent.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by centurian View Post
    Didn't those happen before SOX
    Yes and SOX made it easier to directors put in jail if necessary.

    Leave a comment:


  • centurian
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Some execs are doing long time in jail, ie - Enron, WorldCom chaps.
    Didn't those happen before SOX

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Then news comes amid reports that the villain in new James Bond movie ‘Skyfall’ is a ‘leading hedge fund manager’, with Bond tasked to understand what exactly it is that he does, and why everyone around him is losing their house.

    An insider from the set told us, “It’s definitely Bond’s toughest test yet – he’s thwarted at every turn by morally bankrupt behaviour that on the surface is completely legal.”

    “Though I have to say that it’s one of cinema’s most satisfying moments when he smashes the banker’s face into a dirty toilet.”
    Classic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Fat lot of good that's done.
    From the comments I've had from contacts in the US Sarbanes Oxley was a real pain in the neck to implement.

    No doubt it allowed the big consultancies to generate some nice fat invoices, so that's alright then.

    Leave a comment:


  • kingcook
    replied
    We all have to lower ourselves sometimes. As an IT contractor, i've had to deal with agents

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Drug kingpins deny lowering themselves to do business with ‘bankers’

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Fat lot of good that's done.
    Some execs are doing long time in jail, ie - Enron, WorldCom chaps.

    Plus lots of work to professionals in compliance

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Two words - Sarbanes Oxley
    Fat lot of good that's done.

    Leave a comment:


  • moggy
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    The obvious course of action now is to slap a big fine on the company, so that they have to save money by sacking a bunch of innocents and replacing them with Bobs.

    Never hold the directors or managers personally responsible; that would be wrong!
    who gets these fines..

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    not sure why anyone is surprised money has no morals, of course how do you think they became so rich in the first case?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Never hold the directors or managers personally responsible; that would be wrong!
    Two words - Sarbanes Oxley

    Leave a comment:


  • alreadypacked
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    The obvious course of action now is to slap a big fine on the company, so that they have to save money by sacking a bunch of innocents and replacing them with Bobs.

    Never hold the directors or managers personally responsible; that would be wrong!
    There was a story on one of the Irish sites today, that 2 of the people named in the HSBC reoprt were now heading up one of the crashed Irish banks and the other heading up NAMA.

    The story has been taken down now

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    The obvious course of action now is to slap a big fine on the company, so that they have to save money by sacking a bunch of innocents and replacing them with Bobs.

    Never hold the directors or managers personally responsible; that would be wrong!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X