• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "David Cameron suggests cutting housing benefit for under-25s"

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Slaughter of first-borns could save £50bn in Child Benefit, pledges Cameron

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Childishness aside (unless you seriously still don't understand the utter basics of economics) I am actually very much against corporations.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    12 pages, have you lot still not decided who's right?
    No but it turns out Robinho is in favour of mega corps exploiting cheap foreign labour in the 3rd world as it empowers the poor beggars.

    I must admit, I never saw that one coming.

    Confused? You will be.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    12 pages, have you lot still not decided who's right?

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Not sure where i've said that. Just think that people should be able to decide what their own minimum wage is and not the government.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Only because half the population had died in the plague 40 years before.

    The unpalatable truth is that a lot of the financial problems we are seeing today are due, directly or otherwise, to overpopulation, combined with ever increasing fluidity of the world economy.
    I agree to an extent, although Robinho appears to think bringing cheaper workers in to the UK is a capitalist thing. Where capitalist is a synonym for good.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    Maggie believed in individual freedoms and liberties.

    Would you call her a socialist?
    I'm not sure I know what a socialist is. Surely all UK political parties have socialist tendencies, and have done since 1400 or so.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post

    ..

    Nevertheless Britain seemed to do well after the circa 1400 peasant uprising.
    Only because half the population had died in the plague 40 years before.

    The unpalatable truth is that a lot of the financial problems we are seeing today are due, directly or otherwise, to overpopulation, combined with ever increasing fluidity of the world economy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Maggie believed in individual freedoms and liberties.

    Would you call her a socialist?

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    The were not socailist policies. They were policies to minimise the power of the state and protect the rights of individuals. See US constitution for a more refined example.

    That is the key to good forture and what has gone wrong in many of the hot countries.
    Being made more equal is not socialist?

    Nevertheless Britain seemed to do well after the circa 1400 peasant uprising.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    This thread is quite long. Has anyone mentioned Adolf Hitler yet?
    Yes, Robinho. He's got a yellow card.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    The were not socailist policies. They were policies to minimise the power of the state and protect the rights of individuals. See US constitution for a more refined example.

    That is the key to good forture and what has gone wrong in many of the hot countries.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Who knows why the "west" ended up richer than, shall we say, "hot places".

    As an aside it seems to me we in the UK got motoring after the peasant revolt circa 1400, Magna Carta, and the adoption of more socialist tenancies. And again after the Cromwell fellow. Perhaps people become more effective and industrious workers when they have achievable goals that benefit themselves rather than the rich and a little justness and equality exists.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    This thread is quite long. Has anyone mentioned Adolf Hitler yet?
    I have Stalin and Pol Pot up my sleeve

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    This thread is quite long. Has anyone mentioned Adolf Hitler yet?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X