• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Unemployed had to sleep under bridge to work for Jubilee"

Collapse

  • NickFitz
    replied
    The Royal Family comments:

    Leave a comment:


  • amcdonald
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    The point is that Prescott is trying to garner publicity for his election to "Police Chief"...

    "We need more plod on the street, not private security firms!" - that kind of thing.

    He's a self-serving fat bastard who should be harpooned, sliced up and fed to the Japanese.
    What have you got against the Japanese to inflict Prescott on their culinary experiences

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Styles junior has smarmed himself into a paid job on security at the Olympics during the school holidays. I'll warn him to steer clear of the totty.
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    sure
    More for MTT then?

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    The danger is that he ends up patrolling the car park and seeing nothing but cars, rather than Olympic events.
    He probably hopes so, that's easy money. However he's had to go on training courses, take exams and get through panel interviews, so the smug sod might have to do some proper work!

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Styles junior has smarmed himself into a paid job on security at the Olympics during the school holidays. I'll warn him to steer clear of the totty.
    The danger is that he ends up patrolling the car park and seeing nothing but cars, rather than Olympic events.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Styles junior has smarmed himself into a paid job on security at the Olympics during the school holidays. I'll warn him to steer clear of the totty.
    sure

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Who picks up this tab? yes its the taxpayer.
    I don't know enough details. Coal Board probably, but failing that the social services.

    But you are missing the point. It was more about discouraging you to go on strike than about taxpayers' money. An awful lot of taxpayers' money was blown on paying the police the kind of overtime that gave them holiday villas in Spain. Oh, and keeping an oil fired power station on standby at great cost.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    14 hours standing around is hellish eternity though. Unless as you say you are less than 30 years of age and looking for totty.
    Styles junior has smarmed himself into a paid job on security at the Olympics during the school holidays. I'll warn him to steer clear of the totty.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
    Why not?
    a) because evicting strikers would have been extremely bad publicity, back to the Victorian era etc
    b) old fashioned tenancy agreements which made it difficult to evict tenants

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    14 hours standing around is hellish eternity though. Unless as you say you are less than 30 years of age and looking for totty.
    But at that age I would have preferred working outside to spending that amount of time working in a shop or Maccie D's.

    Probably still would given the levels of pay offered.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post

    If you were renting your house from the Coal Board and went on strike, the Coal Board could not evict you for not paying the rent,

    .
    Who picks up this tab? yes its the taxpayer.

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post

    If you were renting your house from the Coal Board and went on strike, the Coal Board could not evict you for not paying the rent,
    Why not?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    14 hours standing around is hellish eternity though. Unless as you say you are less than 30 years of age and looking for totty.
    How much totty was there among the crowds?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    It isn't just the efficiency - By eliminating and avoiding public service monopolies as far as possible, they can prevent bolshie unions holding the country to ransom as they did in the 70s.

    (And despite being partly bankrolled by unions, the same incentive holds as much for Labour as the Tories.)
    And that was the basis for persuading so many that home ownership was a desirable thing.

    If you were renting your house from the Coal Board and went on strike, the Coal Board could not evict you for not paying the rent,

    If you'd sunk your life savings into your own house, you were going to think twice about going on strike then risking repossession and getting landed with hefty penalities for moirtgage payments in arrears.

    Ditto on a smaller scale if you'd taken out a hefty loan for a car.

    Labour followed this through with a policy of easy credit.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    I rmember doing stuff like this for free in my student days.

    If I were still young and on JSA I would have seen it as an adventure and a chance to meet some totty.

    Better than sitting at home writing out job applications, even if the totty failed to matetialise.
    14 hours standing around is hellish eternity though. Unless as you say you are less than 30 years of age and looking for totty.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X