Don't you just love Tort?

[NotAllThere]

The getaway driver should have been prosecuted for GBH. As a direct result of his criminal behaviour, his nephew was severely injured.

[TheFaQQer]

You don't need the www in the address.

It's a picture of a cake for anyone who couldn't guess.

[Sysman]

Disabled crook sues ‘negligent’ getaway driver | Metro.co.uk

Possibly better than the snail in the ginger beer bottle.

But a High Court judge ruled that getaway drivers do not have a ‘duty of care’ to their accomplices.

Counself fot the Platintiff: "But your Honour, according to paragraph 4 of subsection 10 of the criminal code of practice, the getaway driver should have a 'duty of care' to their accomplices."

Judge: "In this case the accomplice had opted out. Objection overruled".

[Sysman]

I think they must have disabled deep linking

Nah. Copying and pasting gives "Server not found".

[cojak]

Are you sure you are cut out for this posting on an internet forum lark?

WHS.

[pacharan]

Are you sure you are cut out for this posting on an internet forum lark?

I think they must have disabled deep linking

[SimonMac]

Prefer it with an E

[IMG]http://www.hostedmedia.reimanpub.com/TOH/Images/Photos/37/exps41645_THHC1442844D28A.jpg
[/IMG]

Are you sure you are cut out for this posting on an internet forum lark?

[pacharan]

Prefer it with an E

[IMG]http://www.hostedmedia.reimanpub.com/TOH/Images/Photos/37/exps41645_THHC1442844D28A.jpg
[/IMG]

[Diver]

Disabled crook sues ‘negligent’ getaway driver | Metro.co.uk

Possibly better than the snail in the ginger beer bottle.

[cojak]

Disabled crook sues ‘negligent’ getaway driver | Metro.co.uk

Possibly better than the snail in the ginger beer bottle.