London Array Wind Farm
3D Animation
London Array - 3D Animation - YouTube
The real thing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwXe1...&feature=share
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: The never ending green bollox.
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "The never ending green bollox."
Collapse
-
Uranium enough for hundreds of years and thorium for thousands. At the moment uranium is pretty cheap (hundred of dollars/kg or something) and isn't a big factor in the total energy cost. Nuclear leccie should really be too cheap to meter, but somehow it comes out expensive.Originally posted by d000hg View PostDo we have any idea how much suitable radioactive fuel there is around? In a sense, it's even more a fossil fuel than oil/coal, because at least those are still being produced, whereas Uranium and the like is continually disappearing even if we don't use it.
I don't hold out much faith in fusion being this cheap.
Leave a comment:
-
Do we have any idea how much suitable radioactive fuel there is around? In a sense, it's even more a fossil fuel than oil/coal, because at least those are still being produced, whereas Uranium and the like is continually disappearing even if we don't use it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by BlasterBates
It only took an hour or two to decommission block 4 at Tschernobyl.It did only take an hour or two!Originally posted by AtW View PostBollox.
They carried out a safety test with the power levels too low.
Reactor number four overheated, and the reactor's roof blew off
Five seconds later the core erupted, scattering debris - including a block of graphite used as a moderator and housing the control rod channel - up to three kilometers away.
Effectively decommissioning the reactor
Leave a comment:
-
Interesting factoid. The film China Syndrome was released a few days before the 3 Mile Island incident. I don't recall how the film plot went, but I've heard it's a bit like the accident.Originally posted by Troll View PostAs anyone who has seen the China Syndrome knows, you just let the core go critical, burn through its containment vessel and voila!...it's somebody else problem.
China Syndrome - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Three Mile Island accident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Leave a comment:
-
As anyone who has seen the China Syndrome knows, you just let the core go critical, burn through its containment vessel and voila!...it's somebody else problem.Originally posted by Diver View PostPlus the cost and after affects of decommisioning these beasties which runs into taxpayer billions.
Leave a comment:
-
AGRs are messy and beggers to clean up, and I think the earlier Magnox were worse still. The latest generation III power plants (ACR, EPR, and others) are allegedly a lot more efficient, longer lasting, cheaper and less costly to decommission. And some of them will burn thorium too!Originally posted by Diver View PostI spent several years working at Hinkley Point nuclear power station, i have little problem with nuclear power other than the cost to the taxpayer (me) and the risks from that one in a million accident that seems to happen every few years.
Plus the cost and afteraffects of decommisioning these beasties which runs into taxpayer billions.
Hinkley Point nuclear power station is due to be decommissioned in 2016 by the way, and will cost more to decommission than all of the offshore wind farms currently being built are costing the developers.
As for a vested interest, Yes I have a vested interest. three grandchildren to date.
Generation III reactor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Leave a comment:
-
It only took an hour or two to decommission block 4 at Tschernobyl.
Leave a comment:
-
It's always tricky weighing up whether Nuclear is profitable in the UK because it was nationalised. However in Germany private companies are responsible for building and decommissioning power plants. The German power plants are profitable, that includes the decommisioning costs which have already been set aside. German wind generators are only profitable because the power companies have to buy their feed-in at 2 or 3 times the price they sell it on to the consumer. Therefore wind power has been driving up electricity prices, and will continue to do so.
Leave a comment:
-
Are you sure it was hinkley point? Bearing in mind your record with power tools are you sure it wasn't 7-mile island followed by chernobyl?Originally posted by Diver View PostI spent several years working at Hinkley Point nuclear power station, i have little problem with nuclear power other than the cost to the taxpayer (me) and the risks from that one in a million accident that seems to happen every few years.
Plus the cost and afteraffects of decommisioning these beasties which runs into taxpayer billions.
Hinkley Point nuclear power station is due to be decommissioned in 2016 by the way, and will cost more to decommission than all of the offshore wind farms currently being built are costing the developers.
As for a vested interest, Yes I have a vested interest. three grandchildren to date.
Leave a comment:
-
I spent several years working at Hinkley Point nuclear power station, i have little problem with nuclear power other than the cost to the taxpayer (me) and the risks from that one in a million accident that seems to happen every few years.Originally posted by Scoobos View PostWhilst I agree with you - this seems a bit out of character !!! - Do you have a vested interest in a competing technology by any chance?
Plus the cost and afteraffects of decommisioning these beasties which runs into taxpayer billions.
Hinkley Point nuclear power station is due to be decommissioned in 2016 by the way, and will cost more to decommission than all of the offshore wind farms currently being built are costing the developers.
As for a vested interest, Yes I have a vested interest. three grandchildren to date.
Leave a comment:
-
What energy potential difference would you see in any of the UK's rivers...unless you were proposing building big dams everywhereOriginally posted by d000hg View PostHydro from rivers and from the sea are quite different things... the UK is pretty useless as far as rivers are concerned.
Leave a comment:
-
Hydro from rivers and from the sea are quite different things... the UK is pretty useless as far as rivers are concerned.Originally posted by Scoobos View PostWhat I really dont get is :
Why can canada fuel 50% of BC from Hydro electric power on its rivers and sea, and yet we , an island surrounded by water don't use hydro..
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05

Leave a comment: