• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Are you inside IR35 if doing contract work for one company?"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by doomage View Post
    Aren't you your own boss? In which case would you be interested in outsourcing the punching of your boss every quarter?

    That's why I outsource that to Mrs Woo!

    Leave a comment:


  • doomage
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Punching my boss every quater helps me stay out of IR35.

    HTH

    MF
    Aren't you your own boss? In which case would you be interested in outsourcing the punching of your boss every quarter?

    Leave a comment:


  • bobspud
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Well I think if you're following the debate on beefing up IR35 and Kate Cotterel's comments that when HMRC does take a contractor to court on IR35, that they usually win, I think that is more or less correct.

    The best defence against IR35 is to have lots of contracts. They aint going to chase up each one of those, but if you've been sitting at the same site for a couple of years, I think you'll be a prime target for the newly beefed up IR35 hit squad.
    Thought the HMRC vs LTD win ratio was mostly in the LTD's favour but there you go.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Punching my boss every quater helps me stay out of IR35.

    HTH

    MF
    Punching MF every quarter keeps me sane.

    MF's boss.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Punching my boss every quater helps me stay out of IR35.

    HTH

    MF

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by bobspud View Post
    Normally I'd say the guy fitted your description. But could it be that he is smoke screening the issue?
    Ypou mean to give the guardian types something to moan about? Well you can't trust any of the papers these days - look at the g-spot telegraph article. I was quite proud of that find until NF bought facts into it.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Well I think if you're following the debate on beefing up IR35 and Kate Cotterel's comments that when HMRC does take a contractor to court on IR35, that they usually win, I think that is more or less correct.

    The best defence against IR35 is to have lots of contracts. They aint going to chase up each one of those, but if you've been sitting at the same site for a couple of years, I think you'll be a prime target for the newly beefed up IR35 hit squad.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobspud
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    How the wealthy avoid paying tax | Money | guardian.co.uk

    "This type of arrangement is only really worthwhile if you are earning in excess of £120,000 a year," says Frank Nash of accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg – and some accountants warn that HMRC is unlikely to let you get away with it if you are an employee or only doing freelance or contract work for one company. "There is anti-avoidance legislation to cover that, known as IR35," says Alex Henderson of PricewaterhouseCoopers. "It is really only available if you are a freelance worker working for a number of outlets."

    Alex Henderson is a

    Posted in general so maximum abuse can be heaped.

    Normally I'd say the guy fitted your description. But could it be that he is smoke screening the issue?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Plan BN66 - write an article for the guardian telling the truth about IR35.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Plan B - write an article for the guardian telling the truth about IR35.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scoobos
    replied
    Aaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggggggggggggggg gggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhh

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    I note the guardian have not invited comments so we cannot even go and point out how stupid the article is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sands of Time
    replied
    I contract to a number of 'outlets' - sequentially!




    Tone

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    "Why pay tax at 50%, or even 40%, when by channelling all your earnings into a company you can avoid income tax altogether?"

    Leave a comment:


  • Are you inside IR35 if doing contract work for one company?

    How the wealthy avoid paying tax | Money | guardian.co.uk

    "This type of arrangement is only really worthwhile if you are earning in excess of £120,000 a year," says Frank Nash of accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg – and some accountants warn that HMRC is unlikely to let you get away with it if you are an employee or only doing freelance or contract work for one company. "There is anti-avoidance legislation to cover that, known as IR35," says Alex Henderson of PricewaterhouseCoopers. "It is really only available if you are a freelance worker working for a number of outlets."

    Alex Henderson is a

    Posted in general so maximum abuse can be heaped.

Working...
X