Reply to: Birds over 40 that.. NSFW

[Zoiderman]

Yes but they are filled with corrosive acid, just because she hates men that much.

There is nothing more unappealing than a woman posing like a rugby player with her legs open like that. Unless they are a scumbag like Carol that goes on TV everyday slandering men with her horrible sexist diatribe ....

Jeez Wim, that pose shouts out to me, shag me, shag me now, shag me hard, and make sure you shag me a few times more. I am not entirely sure it is meant to be shouting look at my alluring femininity.

I'd climb over a few women to get to her, in that pose, looking like that. In fact, I'll be back in a short while if I can undo this fecking Kensington lock

[TimberWolf]

Gosh that's



How quaint.

Almost as good as the net nanny in the public library preventing searchs for "Philip K. Dick".

Oooh. One off 56056

[Sands of Time]

I dislike CV.

Made a career out of a 3rd in an Engineering degree just because she's a woman!

AND THEN she goes onto 'write' a book about nutrition / fitness... blah blah blah with no research, qualifications and no knowledge and is then hailed as a super woman because she loses a bit of weight.

I'm glad she got chucked off Countdown and glad that new bird has done so well.


BAH!



Tone

[TimberWolf]

It is not an attractive or alluring pose.

This woman on the right is doing the same leg apart, rugby player pose. No trace of femininity or grace, highly revolting:

I can top that.



Doesn't revolt me in the slightest though, unlike the awful Carol V.

[SupremeSpod]

It is not an attractive or alluring pose.

This woman on the right is doing the same leg apart, rugby player pose. No trace of femininity or grace, highly revolting:




This is how attractive women, that know how to use their bodies and legs pose. In this case they are showing off les crotch, but ultimately the sensuality, enticement/allure and grace is much better:








Also what is revolting is your feedback and even supporting carol voderman. I think it would be too nice for her to be burnt at the stake. I wish something worse upon her.

Imagine if there was a show called "hard men" and they sat on daytime TV objectifying women and saying how they are all useless scumbags? That show would be cancelled and everyone associated with it sacked. Or a show where coloured people were likened to dirty floors and piles of manure. There would be a public outrage.

Look at other male presenters, like the recent case with Andy, who have let slip one comment about an attractive female and been sacked after a backlash.

Yet everyday, "loose women" pollutes the airwaves and demonises men, trying to label every man as a useless provider, useless homemaker and dangerous potential rapist. When they arent doing that, they are ogling their attractive male guests.

Nobody minds though, the home office even encourages this viewpoint through their abuse advert campaigns where every abuse situation is a white male. Rape, domestic violence, never a coloured person or an angry female throwing plates at a husband late home from work. No, that isnt politically correct is it? The truth often isnt.

You are a sell out to your gender my dear ole chump. You might as well just book in at the doctors for your transgender op and get it over with.

Get a ******* life.

Your "attitude" to women in my opinion is somewhat suspect and I can see a common trait in your posts that I'm sure a qualified psychiatrist would find very interesting. The resultant report would probably see you signed up for a spell in Broadmoor.

Do you have a propensity for hitting women of "ill repute" over the head with a hammer and did "God" tell you to do it?

[wim121]

I don't think 'rugby player' when I see that photo. Maybe it's just your liking of rugby players.

It is not an attractive or alluring pose.

This woman on the right is doing the same leg apart, rugby player pose. No trace of femininity or grace, highly revolting:




This is how attractive women, that know how to use their bodies and legs pose. In this case they are showing off les crotch, but ultimately the sensuality, enticement/allure and grace is much better:








Also what is revolting is your feedback and even supporting carol voderman. I think it would be too nice for her to be burnt at the stake. I wish something worse upon her.

Imagine if there was a show called "hard men" and they sat on daytime TV objectifying women and saying how they are all useless scumbags? That show would be cancelled and everyone associated with it sacked. Or a show where coloured people were likened to dirty floors and piles of manure. There would be a public outrage.

Look at other male presenters, like the recent case with Andy, who have let slip one comment about an attractive female and been sacked after a backlash.

Yet everyday, "loose women" pollutes the airwaves and demonises men, trying to label every man as a useless provider, useless homemaker and dangerous potential rapist. When they arent doing that, they are ogling their attractive male guests.

Nobody minds though, the home office even encourages this viewpoint through their abuse advert campaigns where every abuse situation is a white male. Rape, domestic violence, never a coloured person or an angry female throwing plates at a husband late home from work. No, that isnt politically correct is it? The truth often isnt.

You are a sell out to your gender my dear ole chump. You might as well just book in at the doctors for your transgender op and get it over with.

[d000hg]

I don't think 'rugby player' when I see that photo. Maybe it's just your liking of rugby players.

[wim121]

Are these t1ts real?

Yes but they are filled with corrosive acid, just because she hates men that much.

There is nothing more unappealing than a woman posing like a rugby player with her legs open like that. Unless they are a scumbag like Carol that goes on TV everyday slandering men with her horrible sexist diatribe ....

[SupremeSpod]

More my target age group.

Do you know something? That's the best post you've ever made.

The answer of course is "Yes, I would, Can Monica join in too?".

[Sysman]

she might be in her 40's now but that photo is at least 15 years old!

This one is from 2010
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...annes_2010.jpg

Still foxy as a very foxy fox though!

Yes please!

[TiroFijo]

Are these t1ts real?

[escapeUK]

..you'd do.

As someone of advanced years myself - over 40 - I find I'm constantly having to justify my age. Am I past it? Yes, probably. But then I try to think of women who are pretty much the same age as me who are still perfect do-able.

What does women over 40 being do-able have to do with you not being past it? Why not think of Brad Pitt, he's 48. But you arent him, and are still past it.

[vetran]

Marks out of ten I'd give Winona Ryder one and Helena Bonham Carter too

FTFY

[Troll]

[TimberWolf]

That's a shame, could you make do with her sister?

Oh, go on then.