AtW caught by BN66...

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

d000hg replied

28 February 2012, 09:07
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post

Well it seems like a bit of a restriction on freedom of speech.

FOS doesn't exist on a private internet forum.
Leave a comment:
eek replied

28 February 2012, 08:57
Originally posted by centurian View Post

Mmm. Well strictly speaking he did comply with the rules laid down - he didn't invade the BN66 thread, but started his own.

So maybe he is a victim of a retrospective change in the rules

As cojak did admit her finger did click prematurely. But lets by honest Atw will be used to that.
Leave a comment:
shaunbhoy replied

28 February 2012, 08:51
Originally posted by centurian View Post

Mmm. Well strictly speaking he did comply with the rules laid down - he didn't invade the BN66 thread, but started his own.

So maybe he is a victim of a retrospective change in the rules

Oh well.....tax doesn't have to be taxing.
Leave a comment:
centurian replied

28 February 2012, 08:43
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post

Well it seems like a bit of a restriction on freedom of speech.

Mmm. Well strictly speaking he did comply with the rules laid down - he didn't invade the BN66 thread, but started his own.

So maybe he is a victim of a retrospective change in the rules
Leave a comment:
mudskipper replied

28 February 2012, 08:10
Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post

More importantly, how is sasguru going to survive with noone to call a cretin?

AtW will exercise his right to substitution.
Leave a comment:
shaunbhoy replied

28 February 2012, 08:01
Originally posted by centurian View Post

For starting the above mentioned thread.

AtW, MF and doodab were debating the boundaries of winding up the BN66'ers - and AtW bravely stepped up to the plate to test the aforementioned limits.

Well it seems like a bit of a restriction on freedom of speech. Why not have a go at those who are ducking out of paying their fair share of taxes? We have had enough of a go at everyone else that does it. Are these dodgers somehow exempt from criticism or ridicule then?
Double standards methinks.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-17181213
Leave a comment:
centurian replied

28 February 2012, 07:57
Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post

Why was atw banned?

For starting the above mentioned thread.

AtW, MF and doodab were debating the boundaries of winding up the BN66'ers - and AtW bravely stepped up to the plate to test the aforementioned limits.
Leave a comment:
BrilloPad replied

28 February 2012, 07:45
Why was atw banned?

More importantly, how is sasguru going to survive with noone to call a cretin?
Leave a comment:
Churchill started a topic AtW caught by BN66...

28 February 2012, 07:30
AtW caught by BN66...

...thread!

http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...ml#post1491408
Tags: None