Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Stop? Microsoft removes the 'Start' button from Windows 8"
Collapse
-
I think it was NASA who had an observatory on rails. The VMS system that controlled that had commands like BUILDING MOVE and BUILDING TURN.Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View PostAS400 had a POWER OFF command. The manual explained carefully that it was really the command POWER with the parameter value OFF. I always wondered how you could use it with the parameter value ON.
Leave a comment:
-
AS400 had a POWER OFF command. The manual explained carefully that it was really the command POWER with the parameter value OFF. I always wondered how you could use it with the parameter value ON.Originally posted by scooterscot View PostHow am I going to shutdown my computer without a start button?
Leave a comment:
-
surely that should be "most likely"?Originally posted by d000hg View PostSays a lot more about you than MS. You're either too old to learn new things, or deliberately not learning it so you can complain, or genuinely a retard. Since you have actually got a working product, I think the last one is unlikely.
Leave a comment:
-
Makes we want to download the pre-beta version through MSDN and have a look.
I wonder if it will work in Windows Virtual PC on my Win 7 box?
Leave a comment:
-
Don't beat around the bush d000hg, tell 'em like it isOriginally posted by d000hg View PostSays a lot more about you than MS. You're either too old to learn new things, or deliberately not learning it so you can complain, or genuinely a retard. Since you have actually got a working product, I think the last one is unlikely.
Leave a comment:
-
Says a lot more about you than MS. You're either too old to learn new things, or deliberately not learning it so you can complain, or genuinely a retard. Since you have actually got a working product, I think the last one is unlikely.Originally posted by AtW View PostI can't use Excel 2010 effectively anymore
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, XP was the first official release of the NT work to the masses.Originally posted by d000hg View PostWasn't XP the merge of the two threads? You couldn't play games on 2000 properly.
How do the client/server versions of Windows differ these days... I assume there are architectural differences?
I gather that Windows Server 2008 is Vista with the crap taken out. My first impression of it was that it was the best Windows version I'd used so far. But I'm not a games person.
Similarly Windows Server 2008 R2 is Windows 7 without the graphics and games. Or to rephrase that, Windows 7 is Server 2008 R2 with its useful backup utility replaced by a pile of junk, and other useful bits missing, plus crappy effects like transparency added. But you need the Windows 7 graphics if you want to play games or do high end graphics work.
Leave a comment:
-
I can't use Excel 2010 effectively anymore and now they'll turn Windows 7 into pile of tulipOriginally posted by d000hg View PostOh no, now we've got months/years of AtW telling us he can't use his computer because he can't learn new things. It's the Ribbon all over again. AtW just buy Office and Win8 for Dummies and you'll be fine.
It was very disappointing release in terms of what's improved - DOS 5 was much better in most respects.Originally posted by d000hg View PostAlso, what was wrong with DOS 6?
Leave a comment:
-
I tend to write my own little pop up things to access stuff anyway. Good ol' VB6 still has its uses.
Leave a comment:
-
Wasn't XP the merge of the two threads? You couldn't play games on 2000 properly.Originally posted by NickFitz View PostBut all Windows OSs since that have been NT-based, thus breaking your pattern: Win2K good, XP good...
How do the client/server versions of Windows differ these days... I assume there are architectural differences?
Leave a comment:
-
Oh no, now we've got months/years of AtW telling us he can't use his computer because he can't learn new things. It's the Ribbon all over again. AtW just buy Office and Win8 for Dummies and you'll be fine.
Also, what was wrong with DOS 6?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: