• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "'Lone wolf' terror threat warning"

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Tweeter Paul Chambers challenges High Court conviction - Telegraph

    I hope this guy succeeds. About time those in security used common sense.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by EricBartlett View Post
    Mmmmmmmm I wonder how much beef (probable Hindu) Ramjeet Patel might be eating?

    and how many Hindu terrorists are you including in your stereo type?

    Brown skin.... Muslim..... Terrorist!

    If you are going to be racist at least think it through a bit.
    Never mentioned Brown Skin - must be your prejudice?

    Hindu terrorists in the UK are pretty rare (hence the Roast beef comment I made) its the peace loving religion that seems to breed the most. Patel is a cross border / religion name.

    My point you tried to tar with the racist brush, was that British seems to extend to our new acquisitions without exception. I expect Abu Hamza to be described as 'British' soon.

    "the devil's best trick is to persuade you that he doesn't exist!"

    Not wishing to demonise moderate muslims but we need to DISCUSS the reasons why terrorists are created rather than say "it can't be caused by XYZ because to discuss that would be racist".

    I do think 'Extreme Muslim = probable Terrorist' Just as I tend to think 'extreme christian = Nutter'
    'extreme american christian = white supremacist nutter'

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Yeah all those terrorists called 'Colin Ramjeet Patel-Smythe' British seems to be stretched to mean anyone who has eaten roast beef nowadays.

    Though of course the ones in the UK are probably second generation, lost and alienated with no job and uneducated parents (facts not racism - I believe) . The religious leaders indoctrinate them and tell them tales from the home country. Why not bring in a system that would automatically make them leaders, allow them to have as many women as they want and rights above most of the oppressive whites. Worst case scenario they go to Valhalla with 72 virgins.

    It's just like all those Americans called O'Halloran who paid a whole load of money to a bunch of crooks running protection rackets & prostitution in the 'home' country. Once they realised the IRA were training all the terrorists killing US servicemen and the money stopped they came to the table. They didn't care how many Brits they killed,the Irish were freedom fighters but once they started blowing up marines they had to go.

    Lets stop the good brains escaping to the UK and do an India or China, bring them to the production line, show them the benefits of capatalism.
    Even by the standards of CUK, that brings incoherent (or is it drunken?) ranting to a new level

    Leave a comment:


  • EricBartlett
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Yeah all those terrorists called 'Colin Ramjeet Patel-Smythe' British seems to be stretched to mean anyone who has eaten roast beef nowadays.
    Mmmmmmmm I wonder how much beef (probable Hindu) Ramjeet Patel might be eating?

    and how many Hindu terrorists are you including in your stereo type?

    Brown skin.... Muslim..... Terrorist!

    If you are going to be racist at least think it through a bit.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    How will that help when most terrorists are British born e.g. July 7 or the reports that a quarter of terrorists in Somalia are British?
    Yeah all those terrorists called 'Colin Ramjeet Patel-Smythe' British seems to be stretched to mean anyone who has eaten roast beef nowadays.

    Though of course the ones in the UK are probably second generation, lost and alienated with no job and uneducated parents (facts not racism - I believe) . The religious leaders indoctrinate them and tell them tales from the home country. Why not bring in a system that would automatically make them leaders, allow them to have as many women as they want and rights above most of the oppressive whites. Worst case scenario they go to Valhalla with 72 virgins.

    It's just like all those Americans called O'Halloran who paid a whole load of money to a bunch of crooks running protection rackets & prostitution in the 'home' country. Once they realised the IRA were training all the terrorists killing US servicemen and the money stopped they came to the table. They didn't care how many Brits they killed,the Irish were freedom fighters but once they started blowing up marines they had to go.

    Lets stop the good brains escaping to the UK and do an India or China, bring them to the production line, show them the benefits of capatalism.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    And you must have trained with a broom in Dad’s Army

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    all weapons are dangerous you fool. and not just in public places.

    as for your first couple of points, you are are so far out of of your depth, I'd get back to laser quest if i were you

    And you must have trained with a broom in Dad’s Army

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Yes I know, but that can't be done with the thumb around the grip.

    Also, the gun has to be cocked first therefore, the right hand has to come out the trigger or done with the left hand.
    Flicking with the thumb can also accidently push the safety catch in the 2nd position being automatic.
    When on automatic, the gun loses accuracy, and is dangerous in public places.
    all weapons are dangerous you fool. and not just in public places.

    as for your first couple of points, you are are so far out of of your depth, I'd get back to laser quest if i were you



    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    Ignorance is bliss , eh Paddy.
    The index finger runs parallel to the trigger guard, outside the guard. The idea being safety first, but close enough to get onto the trigger in a hurry.
    The safety is designed to be flicked with the thumb, not the trigger finger, for speed. Many weapons are designed to be ambidextrous, either for left handed people, or for certain tactical situations. Thats why you will often see a safety on both sides of the weapon.


    Yes I know, but that can't be done with the thumb around the grip.

    Also, the gun has to be cocked first therefore, the right hand has to come out the trigger or done with the left hand.
    Flicking with the thumb can also accidently push the safety catch in the 2nd position being automatic.
    When on automatic, the gun loses accuracy, and is dangerous in public places.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    What is it with the f^ckwit police that they have their finger on the trigger? To fire it they would have to take their finger out and switch the safety catch anyway. They won't fool terrorists by holding it that way but they will fool and intimidate the public which is their real aim.

    Look at me, see how powerful the state is...


    Ignorance is bliss , eh Paddy.
    The index finger runs parallel to the trigger guard, outside the guard. The idea being safety first, but close enough to get onto the trigger in a hurry.
    The safety is designed to be flicked with the thumb, not the trigger finger, for speed. Many weapons are designed to be ambidextrous, either for left handed people, or for certain tactical situations. Thats why you will often see a safety on both sides of the weapon.


    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    How will that help when most terrorists are British born e.g. July 7 or the reports that a quarter of terrorists in Somalia are British?
    True. But we might limit the numbers going forward.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    It's just in case someone comes along with a fully loaded tableleg.

    You can't be too careful you know.
    That's the price of having armed police. Innocent (or guilty) people may end up getting shot by accident.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    What is it with the f^ckwit police that they have their finger on the trigger? To fire it they would have to take their finger out and switch the safety catch anyway. They won't fool terrorists by holding it that way but they will fool and intimidate the public which is their real aim.

    Look at me, see how powerful the state is...

    Your posts are becoming as bizarre, irrelevant and nonsensical as Lord Haw Haw's.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    What is it with the f^ckwit police that they have their finger on the trigger? To fire it they would have to take their finger out and switch the safety catch anyway. They won't fool terrorists by holding it that way but they will fool and intimidate the public which is their real aim.

    Look at me, see how powerful the state is...

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    . I reckon its just an excuse to get more money and for men with small willies who were bullied at school to carry big guns and go around inconveniencing the population.
    .
    I don't think Dim has a big gun, although he does drive his tinted Peugeot people carrier quite aggressively.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X