• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "What is your most pointless Flounce?"

Collapse

  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Right. Feck it. I'm off until this annoying 'like' thing is turned off.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by KimberleyChris View Post
    Don't forget that we are both at an age now where you have to start to worry about bits dropping off.
    That's not a sign of age, it's an STD.

    Leave a comment:


  • KimberleyChris
    replied
    Don't forget that we are both at an age now where you have to start to worry about bits dropping off.

    Don't have nightmares...

    Leave a comment:


  • KimberleyChris
    replied
    Today 22:21

    northernladuk
    Godlike


    This message is hidden because northernladuk is on your ignore list

    View Post
    Remove northernladuk from ignore list


    View Post



    Life is just a little bit sweeter tonight!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • EricBartlett
    replied
    Originally posted by KimberleyChris View Post
    OK. I've run a tape measure round Kim, and my big manly chest plus moobs is bigger than her little girly chest plus hooters.

    Which one of us gets banned?
    I am reasonably confident that nobody on the board is interested in your moobs, either the girlies or gricer, no matter how big.
    But I am even more certain that a fairly large percentage would show more than a passing interest in Kims no matter how <ahem> small.

    I could be wrong.....

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Which ever one keeps coming on and posting tripe.
    Should be the fella pretending to have a wife.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by KimberleyChris View Post
    OK. I've run a tape measure round Kim, and my big manly chest plus moobs is bigger than her little girly chest plus hooters.

    Which one of us gets banned?
    Which ever one keeps coming on and posting tripe.

    Leave a comment:


  • KimberleyChris
    replied
    OK. I've run a tape measure round Kim, and my big manly chest plus moobs is bigger than her little girly chest plus hooters.

    Which one of us gets banned?

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Hmm. We learned butchery from nothing in the first place without dying out.

    Exactly. Not exactly difficult to carve up meat is it?


    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I think the decades (at the very very least) of warning as things start to go wrong will give us time to learn such things.
    Or are you basing your predictions on a cross between Mad Max and The Day After Tomorrow?
    He is basing them on talking out of his arse without thinking it through. The bizarre rationale that runs through all of his posting history.
    A waste of oxygen.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by wim121 View Post
    Some argue we are mammals and have adapted in the past. However I disagree we will adapt as well as before in the future. Many skills including butchery for instance have shrunk or disappeared. Even asking modern western inhabitants to survive in the wild nowadays as opposed to a century ago is a far more arduous task.
    Hmm. We learned butchery from nothing in the first place without dying out. I think the decades (at the very very least) of warning as things start to go wrong will give us time to learn such things.
    Or are you basing your predictions on a cross between Mad Max and The Day After Tomorrow?

    Leave a comment:


  • KimberleyChris
    replied
    Does anybody know how to take 'Started by KimberleyChris' OFF the header for this thread?

    Why don't we just have a 'sticky' thread at the top for 'Ongoing Feuds'.

    It could actually be fun...we could arrange duels, although I don't know how I would survive under the combined firepower of those fine debaters pjClarke and Dodgy .

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by wim121 View Post
    That was supposed to be "it" ...

    Also just because you dont understand something, doesnt make it tedious bollocks.

    The whole point behind adapting and shrinking is that the earth is already overpopulated. There are concerns by many, on how we will support a global expanding population. Even in our current stable climate, resources are limited and we are bursting at the seams. Conflicts over land and resources will continue to happen.

    In the event of a major climate change, such as the ice caps melting and flooding low lying land or glaciers forcing human settlements south, the human race will have to dramatically adapt to those circumstances and it will have to shrink in size as less of the earth will be inhabitable.

    Some argue we are mammals and have adapted in the past. However I disagree we will adapt as well as before in the future. Many skills including butchery for instance have shrunk or disappeared. Even asking modern western inhabitants to survive in the wild nowadays as opposed to a century ago is a far more arduous task.
    I understand what you are saying.
    And it IS tedious bollocks.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • wim121
    replied
    Originally posted by EricBartlett View Post
    On an ego trip?

    Adapt and shrink?? WTF
    That was supposed to be "it" ...

    Also just because you dont understand something, doesnt make it tedious bollocks.

    The whole point behind adapting and shrinking is that the earth is already overpopulated. There are concerns by many, on how we will support a global expanding population. Even in our current stable climate, resources are limited and we are bursting at the seams. Conflicts over land and resources will continue to happen.

    In the event of a major climate change, such as the ice caps melting and flooding low lying land or glaciers forcing human settlements south, the human race will have to dramatically adapt to those circumstances and it will have to shrink in size as less of the earth will be inhabitable.

    Some argue we are mammals and have adapted in the past. However I disagree we will adapt as well as before in the future. Many skills including butchery for instance have shrunk or disappeared. Even asking modern western inhabitants to survive in the wild nowadays as opposed to a century ago is a far more arduous task.

    Leave a comment:


  • KimberleyChris
    replied
    Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
    Is Kim Hot ?
    The quiet ones are ALWAYS the best.....

    Leave a comment:


  • EricBartlett
    replied
    Originally posted by wim121 View Post
    <Tedious bollox>
    in the next 10k years that i will make the earth uninhabitable, almost a certainty is that the human race will have to adapt and shrink.
    <Tedious bollox>
    On an ego trip?

    Adapt and shrink?? WTF

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X