• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Today's challenge

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Today's challenge"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    It's not a fallacy, there is far less money floating around up here at least.
    These money are going to pay off hefty retirement costs of civil servants.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Another fallacy.

    The truth is "ConDems have made lots of talk about cuts to public services, whilst at the same time spending more than Labour and increasing public debt".
    It's not a fallacy, there is far less money floating around up here at least.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Don't read the newspapers*


    *Except articles in the DM about Kelly Brook's underwear.

    Link?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    ConDem have made lots of cuts to public services?
    Another fallacy.

    The truth is "ConDems have made lots of talk about cuts to public services, whilst at the same time spending more than Labour and increasing public debt".

    Leave a comment:


  • KimberleyChris
    replied
    At the last election, Gordon Brown was faced with an economy like a Range Rover stuck in a ditch.

    Gordon's solution was to engage first gear, floor the throttle, and worry about the extra fuel used after the Rover was out of the ditch.

    The Con/Dem's solution was to completely drain the fuel tank to make the Rover lighter, then stand on the bank and wait for the Rover to drive itself out of the ditch.

    Simples....

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    ConDems decided not to count Bobs, allowed an unlimited number to come in uncounted, and reduced their minimum wage.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    You shoud always make love with a condem if you don't want to end up in labour.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Using only one sheet of fag paper, separate the policies of New Labour and the Coalition.
    ConDem have made lots of cuts to public services?

    Leave a comment:


  • KimberleyChris
    replied
    Yyyyaaaaaawwwwnnnnnn!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Don't read the newspapers*


    *Except articles in the DM about Kelly Brook's underwear.

    OK, give you that one

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Don't read the newspapers*


    *Except articles in the DM about Kelly Brook's underwear.

    I didn't think she wore any.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Don't read the newspapers*


    *Except articles in the DM about Kelly Brook's underwear.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by hyperD View Post
    Hehe, exactly my astute crustacean.

    How the likes of certain persons that go on about "Thatch" in an almost Ben Eltonesque parody of hypocrisy on this board, to those that shower platitudes on a bunch of privately educated "socialists for the common man" authoritarian "do as I say, not as I do" troughers, and despite the exposition of such felonies as the expenses saga on the net and the indifference of the MSM to hold these ******* to account, we still burn the precious hours of our short lives thinking there is a difference in voting for the blue team, or the red team, or god help the mindless cretins, the yellow *******.

    Ignore them.

    Switch off the TV.

    Don't read newspapers.

    Enjoy the beauty of your short lives.

    Invoice.

    Be happy.

    Love.

    Carpe diem.
    whs

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Using only one sheet of fag paper, separate the policies of New Labour and the Coalition.
    Hehe, exactly my astute crustacean.

    How the likes of certain persons that go on about "Thatch" in an almost Ben Eltonesque parody of hypocrisy on this board, to those that shower platitudes on a bunch of privately educated "socialists for the common man" authoritarian "do as I say, not as I do" troughers, and despite the exposition of such felonies as the expenses saga on the net and the indifference of the MSM to hold these ******* to account, we still burn the precious hours of our short lives thinking there is a difference in voting for the blue team, or the red team, or god help the mindless cretins, the yellow *******.

    Ignore them.

    Switch off the TV.

    Don't read newspapers.

    Enjoy the beauty of your short lives.

    Invoice.

    Be happy.

    Love.

    Carpe diem.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    The coalition shouts more loudly in EU meetings, but not really a tangible difference as such.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X