Reply to: ECHR shoots itself in the foot again

[AtW]

We'd finally have that property crash everyone keeps talking about !

Only on houses "worth" over £10 mln.

HTH

[Basil Fawlty]

What is we applied this to all the dodgy Russians living over here?

We'd finally have that property crash everyone keeps talking about !

[AtW]

What is we applied this to all the dodgy Russians living over here?

There is tarmac big enough in Russia to fit them all

[BrilloPad]

Put them on the first plane there, disembark him onto the runway if necessary - then he can sue if he wants to, chances are he'll have other priorities in life.

What is we applied this to all the dodgy Russians living over here?

[AtW]

Put them on the first plane there, disembark him onto the runway if necessary - then he can sue if he wants to, chances are he'll have other priorities in life.

[BrilloPad]

Radical cleric’s deportation ruled out on grounds that he didn’t infringe US copyright laws

Radical cleric’s deportation ruled out on grounds that he didn’t infringe US copyright laws


Quality from the news thump as ever

[Churchill]

Back where? He's not Jordanian.

To his country of origin.

Worse case scenario send him back to Bethlehem and let it be known that he spilled his guts.

That should seal the bastards fate.

[NickFitz]

Not at all, I'm making the point that he entered the country with a dodgy passport and has no right to stay.

Send him back and let them do with him what they will.

Back where? He's not Jordanian.

[EternalOptimist]

If it were in time of war, we'd shoot him.

they keep telling us that they are at war with us

ipso facto, ergo cog sum, quo vardis, etc - lets shoot him anyway

[malvolio]

Why is it a problem? We're deporting him becuase we don't want hiim poisoning our country. Where he goes is not our concern, as long as it's away from the UK. Tierra del Fuego is quite nice this time of year.

[TheFaQQer]

You sure that all the evidence was gathered by torture? I'm not; they can use the evidence obtained legally.

Since he's already been tried, convicted and sentenced, it's a little late for that, isn't it?

[Churchill]

I am perfectly happy to keep him under lock and key, just not to send him back to possibly an unfair trial, or is that too difficult a concept for you to grasp?

I would also suggest that as it is an ECHR decision to keep him safe then the cost of doing so should also fall upon them, maybe they can have him to look after.

Not at all, I'm making the point that he entered the country with a dodgy passport and has no right to stay.

Send him back and let them do with him what they will.

[Mich the Tester]

Which bit of "More fundamentally, no legal system based upon the rule of law can countenance the admission of evidence – however reliable – which has been obtained by such a barbaric practice as torture. The trial process is a cornerstone of the rule of law. Torture evidence damages irreparably that process; it substitutes force for the rule of law and taints the reputation of any court that admits it. Torture evidence is excluded to protect the integrity of the trial process and, ultimately, the rule of law itself" do you disagreee with precisely?


http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/vi...2%20|%20qatada

Fair enough, I misjudged it; you're right, the fundamental principles should be upheld. Which is why Mr Tony B Liar should be put on trial.

[EternalOptimist]

I am perfectly happy to keep him under lock and key, just not to send him back to possibly an unfair trial, or is that too difficult a concept for you to grasp?

I would also suggest that as it is an ECHR decision to keep him safe then the cost of doing so should also fall upon them, maybe they can have him to look after.

you can have him then. we'll lock him in your shed eh ?

[Arturo Bassick]

Which bit of "The bastard entered this country illegally and is deemed a threat to our national security" don't you understand?

Just asking, like...

I am perfectly happy to keep him under lock and key, just not to send him back to possibly an unfair trial, or is that too difficult a concept for you to grasp?

I would also suggest that as it is an ECHR decision to keep him safe then the cost of doing so should also fall upon them, maybe they can have him to look after.