• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "How much is enough?"

Collapse

  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    The quality of the work coming back was external suppliers / 2 man consultancies was horrendous, lacking of experience and knowledge plastered all over it. There must have been backhanders.
    I don't think it's due to backhanders, but undercutting on the original bids.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    You're not working at my place are you?
    WHS.

    Just finished with a client having been in a similar position. Money never an object flowing out the door like a river.

    The quality of the work coming back was external suppliers / 2 man consultancies was horrendous, lacking of experience and knowledge plastered all over it. There must have been backhanders.

    All about short term gains for the client who cares what happens in 1-2 years time. Burying heads in the sand.

    I'm for the off when I'm unable to convince them otherwise.

    Leave a comment:


  • doomage
    replied
    As a starting point, I believe the tube workers are threatening to strike as they aren't getting triple time and a day in lieu for boxing day.

    knob gobblers.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    Just get the contract changed to be based on an hourly rate - then up the hourly rate to whatever you think you can get away with.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View Post
    If you can live without the gig then put in a quote for a ridiculous amount of money. If they are desperate they will pay it and you will be happy to put up with the daft hours.

    Like someone said. Figure out what covers a 16 hour day then multiply by 4, or 10 if you think you can get away with it.

    If they don't cough you have an enjoyable Christmas. If they do you have a great new year/house/car/yacht.
    I used to do this type of thing, but frankly these days I don't have the energy or inclination to do additional work outside of my contracting hours unless it is extremely exceptional.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arturo Bassick
    replied
    If you can live without the gig then put in a quote for a ridiculous amount of money. If they are desperate they will pay it and you will be happy to put up with the daft hours.

    Like someone said. Figure out what covers a 16 hour day then multiply by 4, or 10 if you think you can get away with it.

    If they don't cough you have an enjoyable Christmas. If they do you have a great new year/house/car/yacht.

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    I found myself doing longer hours than I wanted (and contracted for), plus with 3 hours commuting in total each day I was completely knackered.

    I negotiated with the client to get paid 1.5 * rate for over 8 hours/day and then the odd day working at home too. Personally I'm quite happy with that, especially because I know I am very expensive compared to other contractors here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Yes, it's not. I was talking to one of the other guys on the phone yesterday and he said he's been doing 12hr days for months. The PM seems to be one of those lunatics who thinks if he turns around to you at 4pm and says "I need you to do this today as well" it will magically happen even though it's about two days worth of work, so I don't think he is kidding.
    Arggh I hear you - got an email from clientco bod today - when will all this extra work that is poorly defined and wasn't mentioned when we agreed our plan last week get done? Had ask colleague to write the reply because I couldn't write one without abusive swearing

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Well, I would guess based on experience with other projects like this that having next year off is actually a possibility.



    Nah, then there is no chance of it deteriorating into a pointless spat
    I wasn't being too serious just having a dig at something SY said when MF suggested the opposite for his current tale of stupidity woe.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    You need to know the size of the penalty clause. That is what they need you to avoid and it takes 10%, 20% of that for you to fix the problem they will pay it.
    Well, I would guess based on experience with other projects like this that having next year off is actually a possibility.

    Originally posted by eek View Post
    On a sidenote shouldn't this be moved to Business/Contracts
    Nah, then there is no chance of it deteriorating into a pointless spat

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    16 hour IT days doesn't sound healthy. Still, kerching.
    Yes, it's not. I was talking to one of the other guys on the phone yesterday and he said he's been doing 12hr days for months. The PM seems to be one of those lunatics who thinks if he turns around to you at 4pm and says "I need you to do this today as well" it will magically happen even though it's about two days worth of work, so I don't think he is kidding.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    If I quadruple it I can have next year off

    That would actually be worth the 2 weeks of hassle.
    You need to know the size of the penalty clause. That is what they need you to avoid and it takes 10%, 20% of that for you to fix the problem they will pay it.

    On a sidenote shouldn't this be moved to Business/Contracts

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    16 hour IT days doesn't sound healthy. Still, kerching.
    Are you really kerching if you are on a professional working day which you quoted on the basis of 8 hours.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Take you hourly rate and ensure that your professional day covers 16 of those hours. Then double it for the week between Christmas and New Year.

    Of course if you don't want the work quadruple it but there is no way I would be working 12-16 hour days for any length of time. Chances are its those expectations of hours that are the real reason they are in such a mess.
    If I quadruple it I can have next year off

    That would actually be worth the 2 weeks of hassle.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    16 hour IT days doesn't sound healthy. Still, kerching.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X